English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Did Iraq have WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION?
DID IRAQ HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH 9/11?


THE ANSWER IS NO THEY DID NOT.

But don't take it from me...

TAKE IT FROM THAT DUMB BASTARD w' BUSH AS HE ACTUALLY ADMITS TO IT ON THIS RARE AUTHENTIC CNN VIDEO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zo9X02rpxsE&mode=related&search=

What did Iraq have to do with the attack on the WTC?
"NOTHING" - Bush himself.


I want everyone to hold onto this link. Show it to every illiterate, neocon, warhawk and pro-Iraq war person you can find.

2006-08-31 17:55:24 · 15 answers · asked by neoconbush 1 in Politics & Government Government

15 answers

Its so sad how Bush lied to America at first to force us to go to war in iraq....then turns around and claims everything was false - YET, nobody besides the people who pre-hated him acknowledge that he's a liar and a cheat.

What's even funnier is that if BUSH says NO IRAQ HAD NO WMD and NO IRAQ HAD NO PART IN 9/11...these damned Bush Cheerleaders INSIST that Iraq was guilty in both counts - as if Bush finally telling the truth IS NOT TRUE FOR THEM.

I swear to gawd, when you look at neocons and right winged republicans, you have to wonder what their lives are like wherever they are and how they can be so damned ignorant. Its like "The Allegory of the Cave".

2006-08-31 18:43:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sometimes I have to laugh about the lunacy of anti-war protesters. When Bush first attacked Iraq he had a Presidential approval rating in the mid 90% and now it is in the mid 30%. His stance on Iraq did not change but the fickleness of the American people did.

The problem with the war in Iraq is the fact that we fight it on the evening news. If an innocent iraqi gets a hang nail because of an American mishap we start crying how inhuman the war is!!!

The troops fighting in Iraq love President Bush and they believe they are fighting for a reason. It is the tree-huggers back in the state who make these people's actions monsterous. I hate hearing people say things like "I support the troops, but I do not support the war." What kind of bullshit is this. Your fellow Americans are putting their lives on the line each and everyday and you would make their commintment out to be meaningless.

So, let's pretend for a second. President Bush has been pro-war since the beginning. The Democrats in Congress had overwhelming supported the President and the war. Now, they are saying that they were wrong. They had made a mistake. They have to change their tune as election day approaches!!! But, if I were wrong and I had made a mistake which led to 3,000 American deaths I would be imprisoned and placed on death row. Those who supported the war and now withdraw that support should be ashamed of themselves. They should resign from office because it is clear their opinions change with the winds of modern opnion. You cannot run a country based on the latest New York Times public opinion poll.

2006-09-01 01:20:16 · answer #2 · answered by Mr Mojo Risin 4 · 0 0

Iraq did have WMDs, they were found, mostly chemical in nature, and there has been no direct link to Al-qeada but duringthe 1st Gulf War there was plenty of correspondence between Osmam and Saddam, look into it thru some of the programs they show on the History channel, they have a lot of stuff on Osama lately, and it will make you better informed before asking this question

Sad thing is that when you do not supportthe war, you kill our troops, it strenghtens the resolve of the insurgents when they see the USA ripping itself apart...I fear that this is the beginning of the end of the US, but I am fighting to keep it alive

2006-09-01 01:24:55 · answer #3 · answered by vincenzo445 4 · 0 1

Look at a map you Liberal moron. Crapistan and Iraq are just stepping stones to the real threat which is Iran.

When the time comes for war with Iran, and that time is getting closer and closer everyday. We are in a perfect position to launch an attack.

This is not a war against the PC term "terrorism" this is a war against Radical Islam. The war against Radical Islam ends with the fall of Tehran!!

2006-09-01 01:00:32 · answer #4 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0 1

Iraq holds ALOT of radical muslims. Al-qaeda exists there, and that is not the only terrorist organization out there after us, way before 911 happened.
When the U.S. wanted to first inspect Iraq for WMD, Iraq had MONTHS to hide them in underground tunnels anywhere. Nerve gas could be also be WMD, as Hussein clearly had: in the 80's, he used it on his own people, including kids and women.
Anyway, don't hate the people on your side, but on the other side, please.

2006-09-01 01:05:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Last I heard Bush say his reasons were for invading Iraq was ... Iran. That dude changes that story like the weather. The truth will eventually come out that, his "Mamma Said!"

2006-09-01 00:59:42 · answer #6 · answered by pickle head 6 · 1 1

Oh man, that's old news. You are a tad late on beating the drum now. We know all this. So quit going on and on about it already. Jees. When are you idiots ever going to learn, eh!

2006-09-01 00:59:32 · answer #7 · answered by Chandru M 6 · 1 0

Not at all on both counts, it was just an excuse made up by bush to invade so that he could get control of the oil fields so that he and his brothers can control the world

2006-09-01 00:59:56 · answer #8 · answered by archangel0376 3 · 1 2

NO IM NOT TRYING TO SOUND RACIST OR ANYTHING BUT THE SAUDI'S DID IT.THE IRAQI'S NEVER MADE A ****** THREAT TO US NAD WE ATTACKED THEM. WTF? BUT THOSE DUMBASSES WHO STILL SUPPORT HIM I GUESS ENCOURAGE LOSING TROOPS EVERYDAY, HIGH GAS PRICES, A WAR THAT COULD SOON BECOME WW3 AND NOW THAT WE HAVE A REALL THREAT WITH COUNTRIES THAT DO HAVE WMD'S WHAT ARE WE GOIING TO DO? I MEAN IRAQ NEVER HAD THEM AND WE'VE LOST THOUSANDS OF TROOPS. BUT AGAINST A REAL ENEMY? ALL I GOT TO SAY IS WERE ******.

2006-09-01 01:01:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm going with Public Enemy#1's answer. You're militant, but you are right!

2006-09-01 01:14:31 · answer #10 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers