Only if she is a qualified Republican.
2006-08-31 17:38:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I don't understand why there can't be one. Women are also smart believe it or not. People say were are not prepare. But look people voted for George Bush. Are people happy about him, I always hear people complaining. Why can't a women be president, I bet a woman would be a better president then George Bush.
So I think people should stop saying where not ready, woman should have the same equal rights like men. I noticed woman are not given a chance. I thought the Bill of Rights gave the rights, I guess not.
To woman who said that we talk to much all this other negative ****. What about man doing negative things over passed time history? Not all women are not the same, maybe you are the ones that talk too much and care about beauty maintenance in your mind. Women like that are the ones that should not be President. Not all women are like that, it's just that society paint them like that saying all woman are the same. This is not true.
2006-09-01 00:46:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Questions 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is the truth THE MEN HAVE PROVEN time and time again that running a country is something they can;t handle. If they can not even handle house work, kids, cooking, pleasing there partner and still have time to fix the issues that all and more come up. Why would they allow only man to run an entire country, It is a woman who can handle the entire country and still come home to fix dinner help with homework, clean, and PLEASE their partners..........WOMEN Lets band together this election year and vote for a WOMEN>>>>>>>>
2006-09-01 00:40:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Speaking as a proud independent, intelligent female, I do not feel like a female would make a good leader of a country, of chourse, couldn't do much worse than Bush!!! And ugh definately no Clintons, Bushes, Gores, or anyone whos already corrupt. I want the next president to be one whos at least going in with good intentions.
2006-09-01 00:41:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tammy C 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
As long as it's not Hillary...she'd be to divisive. Condi, she'd be better, but still...divisive. Besides that, who is there?
I'm not sure if a woman is cut out for the job of President..by nature we are ruled more by our emotions, which could take us in a negative direction. Could you imagine? A female President wondering.. "I know what Tony Blair said....but what did he really mean, exactly...." Analyzing everything to death....could be a nightmare.
2006-09-01 16:24:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by loubean 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'll vote for Hillary if the democrats can't offer anyone better. Frankly, I don't care who is president as long as its not another republican. At least Bush has no offspring who can be a threat in the future.
2006-09-01 00:42:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by boukenger 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm a woman and I think that would be the worst thing that could ever happen to our government. We talk to much ,don't listen enough, and don't make good decisions.
2006-09-01 00:42:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by g-day mate 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush is a eunuch president. A male cheerleader who wasn't man enough to fight for his country. A woman would be a big improvement.
2006-09-01 00:38:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
no not yet. PMS on a national platform... wow now that I can do without. the country is divided enough, do we really need to Divide the men against the women too.
2006-09-01 00:38:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Work In Progress 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
If she is qualified and does a good job then sure. Sex should not be a determining factor.
2006-09-01 00:42:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Wilkow Conservative 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its doggone Time..Run dont walk to the Polls..
2006-09-01 00:41:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by ck1_content 4
·
0⤊
1⤋