Most of the conservatives on here are "parrotting" bush, coulter, o'reilly, limburger, and hannity's statements that liberals are soft on terror and are not worried about our country. So why did bush try to sell our security to Arab leaders who had ties with terrorist groups? Isn't HE suppose to be so tough with terrorism? Seems he didn't have a clue. Go ahead and make stupid statements or name-call if you want, it only makes you look stupid because you can't answer the question...
2006-08-31 17:34:00 · 11 answers · asked by linus_van_pelt68 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Al Gore Killer: Did you read what I said? They had links to terrorist organizations. We place people in America under arrest for suspicion of terrorist activities...
2006-08-31 17:48:19 · update #1
RLP: If he did, then it was stupid of him to do it. I believe he should've taken responsibility for it. Why did you divert the question to Clinton, and why can't you and other republicans take responsibility. It's always about a man who was president 6 plus years ago. You don't see me writing about the wrong's that Reagan did...
2006-08-31 17:50:58 · update #2
Stand up Phil...: As an owner, would you hire someone who is friends with your rival who tried to do a harsh takeover of your company?
2006-08-31 17:54:32 · update #3
Ozab: I'm sorry. Is Clinton still in office? If Clinton was on the front line, then he was wrong. However, bush is PRESIDENT, so it falls on his shoulders, so here's to another 2 years...
2006-08-31 17:58:44 · update #4
Well, I am a Liberal Democrat, but this issue got way too much negative play by the media.
The Arab nation in question is an ally of the US and was only seeking ownership of the facilities, which would of course continue to have been manned by Americans. China and a few other nations already have such ownership arrangements.
It's probably not the best idea in the world, but again, I think too much has been made of essentially a non-issue.
There are so many other more important things we need to be worried about with this president.
2006-08-31 17:44:41 · answer #1 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
sell port protection ? The Coast defend is in charge for port protection. i ask your self why you probably did not point out, that Clinton offered the port administration to a British company, That the Dubai company grew to become into paying for the british owned company. The question grew to become into, might the U. S. enable the administration settlement stand, with new vendors. yet of direction, you could not anticipate each and all of the data from considered one of those partisan political quaetion.
2016-10-01 04:02:09 · answer #2 · answered by alarid 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He had nothing to do with the Dubai Ports deal. Even your man Bill was lobbying for the deal behind Hillary's back.
Why did CLINTON sell all our weapon technology to the Chinese? Just asking?
EDIT - Ronnie never DID anything wrong - you have nothing to say. George did not do anything wrong with the ports deal but Bill DID sell secrets and lobby for the ports deal ---again, NOT GWB. Just pointing that out.
2006-08-31 17:37:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
he tried 2 slip 1 by the amican ppl, & got caught, i guess he figured wortha try. and his 'friendship' with the arab nations does nt show him n a positivelight, n factdoes nt look good in ANY light 2 me. he s a crooked money hungry, power hungry, wants 2 b king of the world type guy. makes me puke.
2006-08-31 17:44:27 · answer #4 · answered by big foot 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Howard,
Please ask Slick why, he was on the front lines of that deal. I'm very sorry you have been so miserable for the last six years. Here's to another ten!
2006-08-31 17:42:56 · answer #5 · answered by OzobTheMerciless 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
he did not. the arab company was only doing OPERATIONS. they did not want to take over security. that would still be done by the port authority, harbormaster, coast guard, police, customs, etc.
2006-08-31 17:42:08 · answer #6 · answered by Stand-up Philosopher 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because the arabs own the Bush family. Bush doesn't care about our security. He cares that you are scared. Scared people are easily manipulated.
2006-08-31 17:40:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He wanted money. He's corrupt so he did a corrupt thing.
2006-08-31 17:46:52 · answer #8 · answered by Crossroads Keeper 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060828/od_uk_nm/oukoe_uk_life_canada_university
2006-08-31 17:43:59 · answer #9 · answered by ck1_content 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because almost sold our country http://economyincrisis.org look how much already is gone
2006-08-31 17:42:31 · answer #10 · answered by Love America 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋