Was pretty good, however I did over estimate it.
2006-08-31 16:55:42 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Not a bad movie. It had some funny parts to it. but what stood out, was the way the snakes were killing. i got mad when that arrogant guy threw that woman's dog to the snakes. But i had no sympathy towards him when that anaconda got him.
2006-08-31 17:13:41 · answer #1 · answered by henryskia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was advertised and listed as a horror/thriller. Yet, everyone who's seen it keeps saying how funny it is. So, I guess they should have advertised it as a comedy. I refuse to waste my money on it. I won't see it in the theater, on DVD or when it is playing on the USA network...probably next month. I think the concept is really stupid. Too much hype for a really bad idea of a movie.
2006-08-31 17:07:50 · answer #2 · answered by 1yugpj 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It turned out to be a good movie, really funny in a campy kind of way. Better than I expected.
2006-08-31 17:00:51 · answer #3 · answered by Bazinga 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that it's very overrated.
It was 120 minutes of film I could of used to make a sell a sex tape on the Internet with. lol.
2006-08-31 17:01:52 · answer #4 · answered by ♥ Lips of Morphine ♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never went to see it, but it is "supposedly" a really good film. I don't really want to see it that much anyway. I think it probably was being blown out of proportion.
2006-08-31 16:59:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Samuel L Jackson can act even when the concept is weak.
2006-08-31 17:00:35 · answer #6 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was ok had nightmares of snakes the night I watched it.
2006-08-31 17:02:55 · answer #7 · answered by angela v 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't see it.
2006-08-31 16:57:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
contrived idea to tie into the thought that we should expect all kinds of "TERROR" on flights.
2006-08-31 18:54:14 · answer #9 · answered by crambavet 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋