I don't particularly care for either choice, but I do believe that the one who loves the least has all of the power in the relationship.
2006-08-31 17:12:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kate 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Though it be a painful choice I'd say 100% me in love, Been there and done that both ways and the pain of it being me(100%) was definitly worth the fleeting joy of his 50%. Best to have known true love and lost then to have never loved at all.
2006-08-31 16:56:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anntoinette M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I rather have them in love with me 100% that way I know that I have him for myself.
2006-08-31 16:53:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by power of 3 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
100% in love with me. When I'm in a relationship, I always give my all. This way, we're both giving 100%. (sounds like a fairytale to me, i have yet to have someone give me even 75% :P)
2006-08-31 16:58:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lissy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
guess i would have to say have them 100% in love with me
2006-08-31 16:52:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by kimj g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would rather have him be in love with me. Actually, I find that a very loveable characteristic.
2006-08-31 16:53:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tavita 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
nither 50/50
2006-08-31 17:05:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by sassyladytee 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
have them in love with me, it is better to be loved then to give love and have it unrequited
2006-08-31 16:54:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by zether 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The latter always.
2006-09-01 04:40:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither 50/50
2006-08-31 16:53:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by sweet 3
·
0⤊
1⤋