Everyone's pissed at his hair color and yet Roger Moore had rather light hair. Not to mention he was fat and couldn't act. With Pierce everything went downhill after Goldeneye. Plus now he's old and has great hair. Tim and George aren't even worth mentioning. Also, even though Sean is one of my favorite actors, nobody wanted him to be bond because he's a Scotsmen. Plus, despite how much I love those movies they were campy and they really need to be brought into this century. Personally I think Craig's the person to do it. He can bring the serious edge to bond, he's in great shape, and he's not stranger to good action movies. I want to hear other opinions.
2006-08-31 15:21:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I was very angry writting this because I'm sick of the anti-Craig propaganda.
2006-08-31 15:27:47 · update #1
I got a lot of complaints about his physical attraction but Roger Moore was fat, ugly, and had no charm seeing as he was a rapist in quite a few of the movies. And as far as Pierce goes, he was gray in the last bond movie. I really feel he's past his prime
2006-08-31 15:46:41 · update #2
Did anybody read the books? We all have this nonsensical preconceived notion of what bond should be. Bond killed people he was very serious but he had an edgey attitude. He counter the dark side of his job with humor. Timothy Dalton's Bond started to take things back more towards the serious side. I'm not saying that Sean isn't the legend and icon that he is. But his bond was rather silly at times. There's a difference between being humorous and ludicrous
2006-08-31 15:59:11 · update #3
I saw l4yer cake (however you spell it) I thought it was great. See i think one of the odd things about the Bond serious is that they made killing such a light subject, there was hardly ever blood.
2006-08-31 16:05:28 · update #4
Actually I don't hate him. Besides, his acting is quite good. Have you see the movie The Layer Cake? His performance is quite good.
He's quite built up for his body now so I think he will have a good performance in the Casino Royale.
2006-08-31 15:59:28 · answer #1 · answered by Notorious Guy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No! Pierce Brosnan was a HOT Bond! Daniel Craig isn't even attractive. (Spoken like a female with a vested interest)! The only reason they replaced Brosnan is because he asked for a raise, which I personally think he deserved considering how much he raked in at the box office. Craig will suck, you'd better believe it.
2006-08-31 22:27:51 · answer #2 · answered by Discotheque 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he might make a good Bond, but he looks way to serious. Bond has to be suave, edgy, charming and sort of boyish, Craig looks straight up evil and agian way way to serious.
2006-08-31 22:52:36 · answer #3 · answered by archer430 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
b/c he's not the most handsome guy in the world; let's face it, when it comes to bond we're very superficial and we want to see an extremely good-looking man playing bond
2006-08-31 22:34:33 · answer #4 · answered by Cinnababy 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
people hate change. Craig will be a killer Bond just wait.
2006-08-31 22:59:26 · answer #5 · answered by short guy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nothing wrong with older guys, at least sean, pierce and roger had some class.
2006-08-31 22:28:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cause none of em got the role
haha
2006-09-01 02:05:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he look better and act as bad guy
2006-08-31 22:31:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋