English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld are such liberal weenies. Let's do the moral thing and kill every last Iranian.

2006-08-31 14:31:06 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

As a proud listener of Rush Limbaugh and Mike Savage, I know the moral tool of diplomacy is mass murder in the name of democracy. Now that's the ticket to winning the hearts and minds of the world's muslims!

2006-09-01 15:29:57 · update #1

One word people, "Satire"

2006-09-02 11:47:11 · update #2

20 answers

Since america is the only country complaining shouldnt we just do away with those 300 million, it'll be quicker and cheaper and save transporting the nuke equipment?

2006-08-31 14:42:36 · answer #1 · answered by Aussieblonde -bundy'd 5 · 0 1

Whoa dude, you sound ultra conservative. Bear in mind that the Iranians haven't attacked, or even threatened to attack the US. What Bush and his cronies are doing is bullying Iran into not producing nuclear weapons. For one the US has no right to tell a sovereign nation what it can and cannot do on it's own soil. That is a clear violation of their rights and liberties, and from a country that supposedly promotes freedom and liberty, it's downright hypocritical.

Also, there is no conclusive proof that Iran is "trying to get nukes." They're quite a ways off from producing anything remotely resembling a nuclear warhead, let alone anything they could effectively attack us with. Bush is looking for ANY excuse to get the US involved in more war. He is a coward and a liar, who didn't serve in the real military,and is now trying to prove something to himself, and reach for glory.

Another thing, if we nuked Iran, the radioactive fallout wouldn't just stay over Iran, it would affect many of our allied nations in the region, including Israel. The only option would be a military invasion of the country. I think the American people are fed up with this stupid preemptive war BS that this administration is promoting. I can't see how the outright slaughter of people who have never threatened us, like the US military is doing in Iraq right now, is the "moral thing" to do. Maybe you could explain yourself a bit.

2006-08-31 14:57:57 · answer #2 · answered by texasvanity 1 · 1 0

The biggest threat from Iran is not nukes.
Read a book from 1958 called "Empire of Oil", look on an atlas, and see if you can figure out the worst place in the Middle East to start a war.

2006-08-31 14:47:21 · answer #3 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 0 0

~Why haven't the Koreans nuked us yet? How dare we hold enough nukes to destroy civilization the world over, with missiles and bombs to spare.

Hey, gotta love your attitude though. It's minds like yours that will keep me away from tall buildings in big cities.

Kill for peace I say, and all the power to the ones who shoot first and most effectively. By the way, the Chinks and Gooks are getting uppity again. As long as we're gonna do some pre-emtive strikes, let's get them all in one fell swoop.

2006-08-31 14:45:55 · answer #4 · answered by Oscar Himpflewitz 7 · 1 0

Bush and co "liberal weinies". Huh. What gives us the right to have nukes and to tell other countries that they cannot have them. By doing this we have total control over the countries who do not have nukes, and we like it that way. But by your question, I assume you like it that way too. Iranians are just people. People with parents and children and lovers, music and poetry and art. I'm really happy that I will never meet you.

2006-08-31 14:54:03 · answer #5 · answered by irongrama 6 · 1 0

Oh my goodness!! Be careful what you say. You may be committing a violation. I called Iran and Adolph Ahmadinejad a pack of terrorists and had my answer censored by the ultra-liberal thought police at Yahoo!! It was called inciting hatred and violence. Be careful. You're skating on thin ice.
Isn't it amazing that liberals, those virtuous ones who hold free speech in such high regard are the first to deny that very same right to those who dare disagree with them?

2006-08-31 14:47:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

For the same reason YOU haven't nuked Iraq, YOU want their oil. And this is a freebie, YOU haven't nuked North Korea because they have no oil and might roast YOUR sweet little collective bums in return. Remember it always has to do with oil first and moral last.

2006-08-31 15:07:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ok F A G...inestead of sittin on the PC and askin dumb questions like this one, why arent you overseas fighting for your country? oh what? u a stupid SOB, while theres young men and women overseas dying you want us to start another war??? Fu ck ing bas tard. My boyfriend is in iraq and i hadnt heard from him in about 7 months. Do you know how many soldiers were killed in the iraq war alone? I didnt think so, and do you know just how much this war is costing? And ur talkin bout nuking IRAN...ur whats wrong with this country.

2006-08-31 15:20:36 · answer #8 · answered by ms_ricanluv88 3 · 0 0

We are the only country to have ever used nuclear weapons in hostilities. The world hasn't let us forget it yet. The fact that it saved more lives by ending the war means nothing to them.

There are good & fools in every group. If you attempt to kill the fools while they are mixed in with the innocent you will create ill will & very bad press.

2006-08-31 15:10:00 · answer #9 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 0 0

NO. Why should any country have a nuclear weapons? Why should one country have them and another country should not? If Iran does get them who says they will use them? There is only one country that has used them and we have all seen the results of this which is why no country will ever use nukes again on another country.

2006-08-31 14:42:38 · answer #10 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers