does anybody agree with me when i say that TNA is WAY and i mean WAY better than WWE. I like WWE I have since i was a little kid. Not a while ago im 14. But I love TNA it's amazing even the "lower card" wrestlers put on great matches. WWE only has a couple stars when the could have a ton that are just not getting a push. Carlito, Masters, Lashley, Kennady (starting to get there)... the list goes on and on.
So do you agree?
2006-08-31 13:28:15 · 25 answers · asked by New World Order 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
i love how people get so protective and it's just a queiston board
2006-08-31 13:32:30 · update #1
i know that kennady gets the us champ belt
2006-08-31 13:58:40 · update #2
DX fan i like JJ bein Champ as much as you like The McMahons
2006-09-05 08:44:26 · update #3
TNA has much better performers. Any real wrestling fan will agree. Your right dude.
2006-08-31 13:34:08 · answer #1 · answered by Larry 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
WWE and TNA both have their good points. If you like the wrestling for wrestling's sake, TNA kicks WWE down pat. The wrestling is more exciting, the moves are more spectacular, the performances catch a hold of you and keeps your attention. Unlike the current, "let's hold the dude in a head lock and pretend to squeeze while looking mean..." Been there, done that, bored now.
I watch both promotions because TNA has yet to come up with a semi-decent plots and story lines. They are still getting the combination together and Jarret just needs to go away.
2006-09-06 16:11:18 · answer #2 · answered by jennyrascal 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. no afence but TNA is trash i mean double J is champ like all the time what is he like 30 time world champ come every month he has the title and the reason that all the Wwe guys go over there is because there promised to be world champ yeah promised to be world champ that means they know there going to get the title before even knowing when there gonna get a title shot with out doing anything to deserve it I mean come on what has Christian uh I mean Christian Cage done a even be in the same ring as A champion period, give up, nothing because that's what TNA is nothing!
2006-09-05 10:34:41 · answer #3 · answered by king 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA got a lot of things to prove to be the institude of wrestling. I've been watching WWF since I was 10 back in 1985. The only one who came close to beat them was WCW. I wish good luck to TNA cause a bit of competition would wake Vince out and gave us better story lines!
2006-08-31 20:32:47 · answer #4 · answered by AbsoluteMart! 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well when you consider that almost all the wrestlers in TNA were once in WWE, the just couldn't make it there so they went to the only show that wasn't owned by Vince and tried to make a name for themselves.
WWE is better, MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH better.
2006-09-05 13:54:30 · answer #5 · answered by Rocks#1Fan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You haven't been around long enough little man. WWE is the greatest. I will admit that when it was WWF back in the days it was by far alot better then now. But WWE will always be better then all the others out there.
2006-09-06 15:09:26 · answer #6 · answered by legz4evr2000 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WWE has RAW Smackdown ECW and Jeff Hardy
What does TNA have
2006-08-31 21:01:29 · answer #7 · answered by Bandon V 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
TNA overall has better wrestlers. that i will agree with. but for true entertainment, production value and story lines, wwe is better.
2006-09-05 12:25:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
WWE would Smash TNA into little pieces.
2006-08-31 20:39:11 · answer #9 · answered by J-Kidd "07" 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I like WWE a little better. Both good, though.
2006-09-01 16:30:52 · answer #10 · answered by Dusty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋