English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who do you think poses the biggest threat to the security of the United States, Jihadist Fascists or Liberal propagandists?

2006-08-31 11:27:58 · 23 answers · asked by MorgantonNC 4 in Politics & Government Politics

23 answers

I thought they were working together? The liberal propagandist are actually more dangerous because people assume that if they are American they have Americas best interest at heart. The are cutting the heart out of this country.

2006-08-31 11:32:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

Narrow minded bigots. The U.S. has ruled with an iron fist long enough. The desires of Isreal are taken over a much larger population of Muslums. The Radical Muslums are not Facists. The only way to change the way people think is through education. There are many Christian groups, in this country, which don't believe in individual rights. I iterate, Isreal should withdraw to it's original borders.

2006-08-31 18:40:24 · answer #2 · answered by doggiebike 5 · 1 1

liberal propagandist, what liberal propagandist? name a couple. .. how can you say that with all the conservative propaganda that is constently spewing from FOX NEWS. The BIGGEST threat the United States is people like you, Bill O'Reily, IRAN(not Iraq), and the current administration.

2006-08-31 18:36:25 · answer #3 · answered by kahboom 2 · 2 1

Al-Caida been founded by Ben Laden the last CIA cheif, he is in mission, to "terrorize" the USA and the world to give pretext to controversials military intervention all over the owrld, and in USA with the Patriot Act, the martial law. This is all forged !


Bush, Kerry, Clinton, Cheney are all admited lifetime members of the Skull and Bone society, the lodge 322 of the Bavarian Illuminati.
The Illuminati are forging the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World order, ruled by the martial law.
They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
Bush and Kerry | Skull and Bone : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Bush+skull
Loose Change 2 Nd Edition : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288&q=

They haven't just collaborated...they financed Hitler, that was Prescott Bush, and the British crown, it's because, they are all blood related...All in the same secret society, they forged most of history events.The Queen Mother's of England is the leader of the Free-Masonic branch of the Order...Blair is known as the Knight of Maltha, and Geaorge W. Bush knight of Eulogia, please inform yourself on those link I give you, but investigate far more than that...We have to stand against this... www.infowars.com

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor" Project for the New American Century (2000)
Erreur! Signet non défini.
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_consciousness (Class consciousness)
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name...and his number is Six hundred & sixty-six. (Rev. 13:15-18)

2006-08-31 18:42:18 · answer #4 · answered by The Patriot 4 · 1 2

*laughs*

You still believe in the label of 'Jihadist Facist'? Moron

Get an education, a job and a life. Then, perhaps, we can discuss some real issues. Like why America is turning to the right so drastically, why the American government is nothing but the CEO's of several key industries and other such fun topics

2006-08-31 18:32:12 · answer #5 · answered by thomas p 5 · 4 2

the biggest threat to the security of the United States is Bush himself!

2006-08-31 19:45:45 · answer #6 · answered by me 6 · 2 1

hmm... people that killed 3,000 in NYC...

or people that haven't killed anyone?

yeah... I can see how you would have problems with that?

EDIT: some of the answers on here... some of you guys think that some Americans are more dangerous than Osama? Does that even make any sense to anyone?

if you are so busy looking at and blaming liberals that you're ignoring the terrorists (which it seems many of you have)...then you've lost total touch with reality...

2006-08-31 18:31:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

More of a threat future ... Corporate Neo-nazis or present day Neocon mutten heads ?

2006-08-31 18:32:20 · answer #8 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 2 1

Look more pointless bi-partisanship... How exciting!

Don't you have better things to do with your time -like beating up some homosexuals and secretly hating black people.

2006-08-31 18:34:10 · answer #9 · answered by Bobby W 2 · 2 1

They complement each other. The liberals enable and protect the islamofascists. Ultimately the liberals are the greater danger because even after the jihadistanians are gone the liberals will still be indoctrinating our children and college students with their socilialist and communist crap!

2006-08-31 18:36:53 · answer #10 · answered by OzobTheMerciless 3 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers