English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Granted the freedoms in America, people are free to decide how they want to live their life, freedom of religion, freedom of morality, freedom of speech, and freedom to pursue one's own happiness. Granted that these are priciples to allow one to make a life of his/her own, one can also not disagree that come these freedoms also results in the "Me Me" ideal of living. Everything a person does is motivated by selfishness. For example, Companies donate money to charity, not for goodness sake, but for publicity that they are good, which would help their public image and in return make more money, greed is behind all aspects of americal life and motivation. If no one is looking, people behave differently than if someone is looking, so people are fake in a sense. In modern day life here in america, the values are making money, having sex, and hedonistic activities. The values of leave it to beaver days is extinct. The idea of shame, ethics, integrity, honesty no longer matter anymore

2006-08-31 11:00:10 · 4 answers · asked by haveanyknowledge 1 in Business & Finance Other - Business & Finance

4 answers

What precisely is your question?

The fact is that if the US cannot be based solely on morals because it is at odds with the basics of a free market economy and a capitalist system. Our legal/political system and economic system have to align.

For example, capitalism requires that a person succeed, ofetn at the expense of others. The successful people accumulate wealth - convinced that they deserve it from their hard work. Neither of these actions are moral, in any religious sense of the word. Jesus didn't collect tithes and buy himdelf a mansion. Should rich people give money to the poor? Obviously, this is the moral choice.

Too often people look at the US and deride its lack of morals based on gays, drugs, the licentiousness of liberalism, and the audacity of the poor or criminal. What they fail to realize is that morality goes beyond these social constructs. The privileged are often just as immoral, but rationalize it to themselves and make themselves feel better by going to church once a week.

It is insidious, and I'm afraid that it is built into our system. Both well-funded corporations and vocal minorities strain our social fabric, and stretch what is "acceptable behavior". Too often they base this on silly, self-interested axioms "regulation hinders competition" and "you should have to accept everythign that we do". Left unchecked, both of these forces are destructive, and the legal system is the only recourse that we have. In past times we could rely on a sense of community to drive behavior, but people have given that responsibility away as well.

2006-08-31 11:30:52 · answer #1 · answered by Shofix 4 · 0 0

actual tremendous sections of what's now North u . s . of america were lined with shallow seas over 100 situations contained in the most suitable numerous thousands and thousands of years, so the answer on your question is this is probable that it will ensue back...more effective than once. on the plus facet it always takes numerous hundred 1000's of years for this to ensue and then numerous 1000's of 1000's or perhaps thousands and thousands of years for the water in those seas to get locked up as polar ice. Human civilization all started about 10,000 years in the past even as an major portion of Ice Age ice had moved north and human beings began to plant flowers. in view that that fortunate day we've people all around the planet burning stuff and replacing the ambience. so a ways, fairly good...'warming' has been incremental even with the undeniable fact that measurable and the outcomes small, yet significant. significant contained in the experience that the position for thousands and thousands of years there have been no human beings, there at the on the spot are literally billions of human beings nevertheless depending on submit ice age agriculture. Even a small replace up or down means huge issues for anybody and each little thing. Even a mild replace in 'climate' will replace 'climate' kinds...if the rain would not fall human beings received't eat. And that, bro, is the significances of this concern...this is not the 'warmth', or the chilly, this is dependence that all of us have on the rain and on water elements. in ordinary words some a lengthy time period or a lot less of longer and dryer summers, as is taking position NOW, will make the distinction in no matter if some billion human beings will eat or not. So do not purely examine the temperature, examine the rain gauge. in point of fact offered!

2016-12-06 01:40:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

America functions under the laws it makes. You cannot legislate morality.

2006-08-31 11:06:03 · answer #3 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0 0

No longer matter to you maybe.

2006-08-31 11:12:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers