2006-08-31 10:24:44 · 14 answers · asked by wlday2002 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Whether you call it Bush's or Bushes it a colossal failure just the same.
And far far too many have died already. We need to get out.
And for those of you who wish to "stay the course" ... I guess you'll be enlisting soon, right?
2006-08-31 10:40:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What's wrong with feeding kids when they're hungry? And do you REALLY think Iraq is a failure? Maybe. Historians will have a whole lot better idea about that in about 40 years, and it usually takes that long before all the facts are in.
What would you have been saying about Seward's purchase of Alaska in 1868? Was that really a folly? What about the $24 worth of trade goods that Peter Minuit gave the natives for Manhattan Island? How about the Louisiana Purchase?
The difference is that this time we're not buying land, and we're not buying oil. We're trying to save and improve people's lives.
2006-08-31 17:44:18 · answer #2 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You would rather feed civilians (like the ones on the planes and in the twin towers) to the Islamafascists than soldiers?
At least our soldiers can shoot back.
As far as it being a failure by President Bush; if Clinton had taken care of Osama when he had the chance, a lot of what is going on now wouldn't be happening.
2006-08-31 17:33:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I am afraid Bush doesn't know that by creating so much Chaos in the Middle East, he is only creating more enemies. Imagine Arabs coming in and bombing the USA, because they don't like Bush and because the Us has nuclear weapons, well, the US do have them, but nobody opposes to that. And the only country that has ever used those weapons, was in fact the US, so I would be more afraid of Bush pushing the red button than anyone else in the world
2006-08-31 17:32:05 · answer #4 · answered by Moosse 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
As long as the Bush crime family doesn't send any of their own to fight for the United States I believe the conservative Republicans think we should keep it up. It's a good way to get rid of the low income types that join the military in high numbers, they usually vote Democrat and this will keep their numbers down. If you notice, the overwhelming majority of Iraqi veterans that are running for political office now across the land are running as Democrats. George W. Bush is a yellow bellied, chick-sh*t coward who made sure he saw no combat and his daughters, neices and nephews are doing the same.
2006-08-31 17:32:21 · answer #5 · answered by Pop D 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
As much as we can! Those children are suffering and it wasn't their fault. If a person wants to give to the needy then it's their choice, right? Bush or not, people should help all they can. But help their own country first.
2006-08-31 17:32:41 · answer #6 · answered by peg 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If this thing is Bush's failure (notice how it's not more than one Bush like you have it but a possession), then it's Kerry's, Gore's, Kennedy's, Pelosi's, and Hillary's failure, too. They all voted for it.
2006-08-31 17:30:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm from Canada and believe Bush f**ked the dog on this one, hes greedy enough to a country whom isn't perfect but was better off before and destroy everything that was good in Iraq, just for money
2006-08-31 17:30:02 · answer #8 · answered by M-A- Double T 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Start sending politicians sons and daughters and we will see how quickly the troops come home.
2006-08-31 17:32:53 · answer #9 · answered by Later Me 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It's not a failure, we are winning the war against Jihadist Fascism, no thanks to people like you who fight on the wrong side.
2006-08-31 17:35:41 · answer #10 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋