What we truly have lost is the ability to debate for that requires the research you speak of. Accepting the spoon fed BS from BOTH sides and taking it as truth without checking into its validity is absolutely wrong. Unfortunately, that is the state of society today.
2006-08-31 10:05:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by budntequilla 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Drizzt234 said a mouthful. Thank you for your pointless ranting so I could read what he said.
Most pro-Bushers I know seem to have their minds already made up, so any overwhelming information that is contrary to what they think they know about his so called integrity, his so called leadership, or even his so called Christian values, can never be considered by you. Be careful, there.
Bush is not God.
No politician is, so you had better start seeing through the lies of the politicians who possess the most power in this world. Too many people who think like you do, and we are sure to lose the very thing our forefathers fought for.
2006-08-31 10:56:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by catarina 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Here's one of the "pointless comments" you're eaglerly awaiting.
First of all, you really don't have a question. In fact, you have no point.
Should we not blame the president for starting a war over his lies. The terrorist attack on 9/11 was done by a group of extremists. Not, by Iraq. But who did we attack? The fact is, the Bush administration already planned on attacking Iraq, and used this for an excuse. Don't believe it? Read "Cobra II" by Micael R. Gordon and General Bernard Trainor which gives an account of this. Guess who recommeded it to all his friends after reading it...Dick Cheney.
You try to defend Bush, saying we're persecuting him...blaming him for everything. You say we're relying on information from the "biased liberal media". You need to open YOUR eyes and do some research that ISN'T coming from Bush and his lying administration.
They are grinding our civil liberties into the ground...all in the name of "anti-terrorism". Terrorist have always been...and always will be there. Does that mean that we have to be cowed by a dictator? Look at the illegal wire tapping of legal US citizens. All he had to do was get a warrent. They even had judges on hand just for this reason, but he decided he didn't need to.
He is making deals with countries to have them take jobs from American workers... one of which was in part for mangos.
He paid no heed to Michael Brown of FEMA when he said about Katrina. He warned that the dams would not hold and that they had to act. Without a single question, Bush said "We've got it under control", then moved on. I guess you'd say this actual video tape was just liberal propoganda as well -- just made up.
He is giving RETROACTIVE Social Security payments to ILLEGAL aliens -- on stolen social security cards. Why is the Social Security system in such trouble now? It definitely couldn't have to do with 11 million illegal aliens getting retroactive payments on numbers to which they never paid in. No.....in your way of thinking, that's all in our minds.
Look at the numbers on this one...this is important. When a president disagrees with a law or it's interpretation, he can use a "Signing Statement" to show how he interprets it and how it will be used. In the history of its use, before Bush, there were about 176 signing statments. Bush has issued over 750! He clearly shows that he will not follow any law...that he is above the law. If a law is in his way, he signs it away. An example: Congress said there were to be no more tortures of detainies. He agreed to this, but then immediately signed a signing statment saying he would disregard this law. Furthermore, the subordinates would be heavily charged if they gave any information about the tortures that were still going on. Yet, this is all just in the imagination of the liberal media.
You are wrong. In fact, you're brainwashed by the very government that is grinding you.
2006-08-31 10:26:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by drizzt_234 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Do comprehend what socialism is? that's what the liberal democrats try to do to this u . s . a .. inspect the businesses who set up each and all of the 'protests' and tree hugger activities. they are socialist businesses. They get young infants to think of they are helping an honorable reason, then corrupt their ideals. have you ever considered a debate between a liberal and a conservative? Liberals can not carry water. the only time some think of the liberals win a debate is whilst it rather is on a tutor like invoice Mahr, the place they have 5 liberals, a liberal objective industry, and have one conservative on. whilst the conservative makes a stable element, all of them shout over him, and the objective industry boo's. Liberals can not debate, through fact they have not got any matters to stand at the back of. they have spent plenty time calling George W. Bush names, that they forgot to make a platform for their party. in case you may prefer to be certain some arguments, I recommend you click my call and study a number of my posts. not one liberal has been able to counter something I even have published. you will see rather some infantile call calling, and such, yet not something extra advantageous than accusations and insults from the liberals. study my posts, in case you have any questions, e mail me, and that i will back them up. and that i could prefer to be certain you attempt to back up a reason you do in comparison to our President, through fact i will wager you have the comparable previous liberal lies your mothers and fathers have been informed with the help of people like invoice Mahr and Michael Moore.
2016-11-23 16:32:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by rigoberto 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have to agree with Answerman. You're question is pointless. Arguing politics is actually making a statement of a certain view, and backing it up with points of varying degrees (life experience, poll numbers, morality, etc.)
This question, especially with the "screw you dumb*** Liberals" part, is a political rant.
Also, this isn't a question.
2006-08-31 10:08:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by amg503 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Because politics is:
1. Talking about things you do not know.
2. Things you do not need to know.
3. Things you do not want others to know so you have pretend to be stupid.
4. All of them try to be like each other hence they all talk
5. Writing for the points earned even if no one reads to them.
6. It is all about how to cover up mistakes
7. To provoke other loosers to make useless points
LAST BUT NOT LEAST SINCE YOU URGED US ALL FOR THE POINTLESS COMMENTS - DONT FORGET WE ALL GOT 2 POINTS WHILE YOU GOT MINUS 5 -
I believe that is a valid point for my pointless answer lady. Thanks.
2006-08-31 11:31:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by KCD 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
If you think all of our comments are going to be pointless, why did you waste 5pts asking the question in the first place?
Liberalism, Novus Ordo Seclorum, Annuit Cœptis !!!!
2006-08-31 10:04:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Prez. 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
More of a rant than a question!
But, I'm with you on the point of arguing for the sake of arguing, rather than a point of view.
2006-08-31 10:05:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You answered your own pointless remarks and proved that you you are arguing and have not a idea what you are talking about. You have a dirty mouth too. Wipe it off with your bib.
2006-08-31 15:38:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by saltydog 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
you have no actual facts or points here.. just a bunch of slinging and name calling...
yeah... we have no idea what we're talking about, but your maturity clearly outshines all liberals...
calling someone stupid doesn't make you right...
I think it's about time for a mature question...
2006-08-31 10:28:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋