911
2006-08-31 07:22:35 · 23 answers · asked by demoman 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Yes. A small fire fed by a couple of thousand gallons of jet fue.
Plus an impact which removed about half of the structure leaving 50+ stories sitting on melting steel.
LOOK AT BUILDING 7!!!
THATS WHERE THE REAL CONSPIRACY LIES.
2006-08-31 07:29:02 · answer #1 · answered by Salami and Orange Juice 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think Heavy duty explosives took it down
First of all can I just say that when a judge decides what he does he doesn’t decide straight away does he? He can’t just look at the murderer, terrorist or rapist and say he is going to have the death penalty. What he needs to do is hear out both sides of the story first. And I suggest every one here decides for them selves instead of listening to the cover ups that the media has done.
Second of all if you did A-level Physics or even an AS level (like I have) you will realize that gravity pulls everything down at the same rate (9.81 to about 10 m/s^2) So if the towers went down in 6 seconds then I would think the gravity in New York is around about 15 m/s^2 and under that sort of force you will die in less than 60 seconds.
Thirdly I would like to ask is why it was that the twin towers insurance was extended to protect it against terrorist attacks on couple of months before it was actually attacked by terrorist’s?
2006-08-31 10:24:04 · answer #2 · answered by Farhan 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Northwestern's Zdenek Bazant PhD defined particularly for sure the physics at the back of the twin Towers cutting-element collapses. not something greater beneficial than the wear and tear from the consequence of two great extreme velocity airliners grew to become into required. As for WTC 7, whilst "Truther" web content lie and declare the construction wasn't hit via something and experienced purely some small workplace fires the real certainty is very distinctive . whilst it is real WTC 7 wasn't hit via an airplane it grew to become into hit via a one hundred ten tale flaming skyscraper (the North Tower) and fires interior of it raged for hours. NYPd and NYFD radio chatter all day long stated the out of control raging fires on many flooring, the seen deformations and creaking of the construction in the previous its fall down - all information omitted on Truther web content. finally a extreme column failed using thermal enlargement. The failure of this column might have led to the construction to interrupt down notwithstanding if WTC a million hadn't fallen on it, scooping out a million/3 of the front of the construction. it sort of feels to me you're being fooled via politically inspired propaganda. The technology of 9/11 is amazingly sparkling.
2016-10-01 03:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People like you fuel the terrorism threat. Just get a life and stop asking stupid questions. A lot of people on here are American and some of them will have lost friends and family in 9/11, so stop being so bloody stupid, and grow up a bit.
2006-09-02 16:37:13 · answer #4 · answered by paradisefound1980 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you call the fires in the WTC "small," what would you consider a big fire to be? The fires were huge! The temperatures were so high that they weakened the structures and they collapsed!! To suggest otherwise is ridiculous!
2006-08-31 10:18:34 · answer #5 · answered by celticwoman777 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You've been watching that film haven't you?
Check out the way Building 9 came down! That is even better!
Figato; What happens to a liquid when you pour it onto a floor? What temperature does Aviation fuel burn at? and finally, what temperature does steel melt at?
Wake up and smell the coffee mate!
2006-08-31 07:29:55 · answer #6 · answered by The Lone Gunman 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Those people who think this question is in poor taste -
Please before you comment just sit and watch film 9/11 loose change off the net first... Then comment!
Question Everything!
Twin Towers was bloody terrible and everybody thinks they wouldn't have done it to themselves it's too bad!!!!
That is exactly how they got away with it, nice job to make sure the insurance policy covered for acts of Terrorism just before!!!
2006-08-31 11:58:45 · answer #7 · answered by puggz7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHERE WERE YOU ON 9\11?
2006-08-31 07:26:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
"charges" thermite charges times at second intervals placed at very strong power points of the building as said by engineers who are actually educated on the subject.Demolitions and chemicles that only military can have access its that simple our government did this lets start to point fingers and not be in fear.
2015-10-31 00:57:25 · answer #9 · answered by Alright alright alright 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to say, i am still emotionally scarred by 9-11.....seeing footage brings it all back so vividly, i find your question to be in poor taste, sorry it may just be me.
2006-08-31 07:29:24 · answer #10 · answered by who be boo? 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋