Why does it seem like American cities are more likely to vote Democrat and rural areas vote Republican?

Question

To andy g: Most questions don't have a point (unless they're rhetorical questions that aren't really looking for answers). I'm just asking why this seems to happen.

Answer 1

People with more education or who want more education move to cities which are more culturally diverse and liberal, while the same old farmers stay in rural areas, regenerating the same tired ideas of biblical times.

Answer 2

The is a larger welfare populus in the cities. Public assisted groups consistently vote Democrat, because the democratic party is very big on social programs. You don't bite the hand that feeds you. While rural areas may have a lower per capita wage than cities, there are fewer rural voters on the welfare roles. Rural voters tend to vote based on community values more than social spending.

Answer 3

it is real. Its been that way for an extremely long term. cities often vote for Dem mayors and city legislatures additionally. It rather makes you ask your self why. Obama wrote an govt order referred to as the Sustainable community Initiative. States will could desire to alter the way they funnel their tax money and gain this in areas extremely than spending the tax money of their very own communities. The suburbs would be paying lots bigger materials tax, state tax, and could be taxed consistent with mile to force. facilitates for progression, etc would be very costly and sprawl would be constrained to those that purchase 20 acres to construct a million abode on with a view to get advancements which contain water, electrical energy, etc. and sign a paper that they gained't advance the acreage. Evironmental fines would be common and expensive. the folk in suburbs would be taxed by way of the roof whilst their neighborhoods develop into slums. the money from the suburbs would be funneled into the cities using fact the democrats believe that cities lost their tax base to the wealthier suburbs. finally, human beings won't have the skill to locate the money for to stay interior the suburbs so will pass to inner cities. His plan for infrastructure is to construct many highrise residences interior the cities to get waiting for the exodus of persons who will only be compelled to leave their properties take a seat empty using fact no person will purchase them. it is considered to be greater sustainable and greater ordinary to regulate the masses. Its additionally possibly to diminish the inhabitants except they could by some skill make human beings regulation abiding electorate.

Answer 4

Cities are looking for handouts. There are masses who are jobless and using up their retirement funds now to live on. But in the past even, city slickers have not owned much and they have become accustomed to government subsidies and programs to help them live a better quality of life. Democrats support that handout for the masses. Republicans want you to work for it as many hours as you have to and invest to help the companies grow. Republicans want to strengthen the democracy from growing small business. Democrats want to strengthen the social infrastructure. Both have their places. Most people in a city do not partake of the benefits of business all that much except for service industry which struggles to survive most of the time on 14 hour days.

Answer 5

Call 202-456-1414 for the answer.

Answer 6

The cities have more welfare rats.

Answer 7

and the point to be made is what?