Ok, I'm not one to talk about people's looks because I believe we get what we get and we just have to work with it. But, but, but...Fergie, is making me wonder. Her face is really hard to look at. I don't really know what it is. I don't know if it's her skin, masculine chiseled-like features, or the amount of make up she wears, but the girl looks....I don't even know what the word is, hurt maybe. She's not ugly...that's not the word. But from a distance she doesn't look so bad, but when the camera gets close....it's like aaaaaooooooh--ICK---pan out pan out! She can sing her butt off though.
2006-08-31 06:10:52 · 15 answers · asked by Nuseed 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Yes, she is! That's what I've been saying. You know who else is in that category with Fergie - Most of those chicks from Pussycat Dolls. Yeech! I guess you gotta work what God gave you. If you have an ugly face, you better have an awesome body. But it's scary at times. Janice Dickinson too.
2006-08-31 06:19:32 · answer #1 · answered by Fool in the Rain 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Black Eyed Peas surely. She would not have lots skills and all her new singles suck actual undesirable. That London bridge has a respectable beat, yet different smart, each little thing else sucks approximately it. while she became in BEP, it wasn't in basic terms her, and the track became extra helpful. i might might desire to declare my widely used track from Black Eyed Peas is Shutup.
2016-11-06 03:51:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that it is her sharp features that make her "striking" in a way. Sometimes when I see pics of her she looks really cute, and other times.....well, she doesn't look very attractive. But, hey, the girl is cool as ****....i'd hang out with her. By the way, check out her old pics when she was with that fly-by-night group "Wild Orchid" (I think that was the name). If you think she wears alot of make-up now......hoooowheeeee. She had it caked on then!
2006-08-31 06:16:43 · answer #3 · answered by southerngirljw 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you know she was Stephanie on Kids Incorporated a long time ago back in the 80s?
2006-08-31 06:16:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the same way. To me it's her skin and the amount of make-up she wears...not attractive. She's kinda a copy-catter of Gwen Stefani. Her latest song "London Bridge"....a few beats in that song kinda remind me of the song "Bananas" by Gwen Stafani.
2006-08-31 06:35:28 · answer #5 · answered by sarkatick 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think she's kinda cute. Based on her skin she's probably going to age pretty quickly. But I think all women are beautiful as long as you know how to work your assets. And she definitely does that!
2006-08-31 06:14:08 · answer #6 · answered by Tryin2chill 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never really looked at her close enough to base an opinion, but I would kill to have her abs.
2006-08-31 06:16:46 · answer #7 · answered by marie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oh yeah! From far away she looks good, but you get up close and oh man eeeewwww its a big mess!
2006-08-31 06:14:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blame it on the wide forehead. It gets worse when she has bangs.
2006-08-31 06:19:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree - she's a tad strange looking.
2006-08-31 06:29:11 · answer #10 · answered by goose 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋