Alarm bells rang for me when Blair said that if the parents didn't allow intervention they would stop their benefits. Firstly why would we assume that these children were born to people on benefits and secondly loosing benefits is hardly going to help the said families.
If social workers are going to intervene on such families that 'might' be raising children that are going to be anti social, whose standards are the families to meet. Middle class people doing middle class work have different lifestyles and expectations from that of the working class, and they are the people going to be setting the standards
whats next? steralising young adults that don't meet the standards of middle class society.
Social Services is already in place to help children that are being abused or deprived, this next step is nonsence
2006-08-31 06:22:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by marliboco 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was always led to believe you should practice what you preach, Tony Blair is a hypocrite, not into politics myself but can see that Tony actually promotes anti-social behaviour indirectly. It's been a slave soceity for a long time, it's in fact such a good one that people do not even realise they are slaves, films exaggerate the point but the point is you are a slave just as much as me. Then we die.
2006-08-31 07:24:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by true_searcher 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is little doubt of this possibility (probability). In fact, we may also be moving ever-the-more closer to a "neo-feudalist" society -complete with "lords" (& serfs): As the multi-national dynasties increase their controls over nearly every aspect of our existence, we will be ever-the-more "at the mercy" of their passion plays - whilst they "juxtaposition for power" or jockey for ever-increased 'holdings' /wealth (and influence). Moreover, their increasing 'stranglehold' will become ever-the-more decisively inextricable to the point where nothing short of "open rebellion" against the state, will allow for a return of "power to the people." And IF they manage to "control" all the smart "embedded systems" - machines/ robotic systems imbued with state-of-the-art "atificial intelligence," then things certainly could become more ugly than we could ever possibly imagine. Just look at the political trends of today... the writing is on the wall!
We are, however, collectively responsible - each of us has some culpability, for letting this "thing" we now face, become so evidently "Orwellian" and so insidiously entrenched. What's most important to remember, is that we are all "at choice" in each moment of "space-time:" And now, more than ever, we need a participatory, clear-headed, and deliberative populace capable of reaching viable concenses & clarifications in an expeditious manner... if there is to be a re-sanctification of society's interests and a return to eco-cultural sanity! Now, as the multiple "cusps of catastophe" approach, our time for complacency is at its end, or our state-of-the-species is at such risk that our continuing apathy would indeed be fool-hearty.
I invite the readers of your question - indeed a good one- to visit my group's blog at blogspot.com:
http://collectiveintellect.blogspot.com
2006-08-31 07:34:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by cherodman4u 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but this is a complex society this species has developed, and the utopian, free society we all desire obviously does not work. He is using the term "anti-social" as a euphemism for "criminal" because that term would be politically incorrect to apply to children.
2006-08-31 06:17:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by finaldx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we're entering an age when the moral, conforming society is in thrall to the anti-social minority. Look at increase of drive-by shootings, school violence, war, greed, crimes of all sort. No more leaving your doors unlocked, folks - at anytime!!
2006-08-31 06:19:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Da Bomb 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
One day,my boy,the system u have described will be used to calm paedophile panic just before voting time---then we'll see that it's only poor pervs getting nicked,just like it is now.Excuses WILL be found for the rich ones,who will go on committing their heinous offences before God.
2006-08-31 08:42:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not an original idea, Adolf Hitler and his psychopathic cronies came up with this and practised it to the detriment of many.
2006-08-31 21:06:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by 1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes changing to much to soon without thinking of the consequences what a greedy selfish race we are becoming ihope we dont crash
2006-09-02 03:17:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by lpricrn 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ha ha! So I`m not paranoid after all!!! Just one question...when is the revolution?
2006-08-31 11:22:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have been headed that direction for many years...
2006-08-31 06:16:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋