i believe in some of what hitlor was doing, but i dont think people should be singled out for race, i think people should be killed if they are in the bottom half in aperance, intelligence, and physical fitness, i think we need to evolve as a species, im tired of anyone being able to have children, if this process were repeated several times, the world would have increadible people, stupid people are having more children than smart people and eventually all of earths people will be dumb-asses, its time we make the world a better place
2006-08-31 05:35:12 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
its a complete coincidence that i am blonde, blue eyed, and six feet tall
2006-08-31 05:41:02 · update #1
I get what you're saying completely! About the whole having kids thing, you're especially right there because this whole wide f*cking world is going to be a bunch of dumbf*cks before we all know it!
2006-09-01 10:45:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that is the case, then obviously you would be on the list for extermination. You lack the ability to write a cohesive sentence, use grammar or spell well.
It may be my opinion that blonde, blue eyed people are inferior. Exactly whose criteria shall we use? Yours or mine? And it definitely would not be a good idea for you to have children so that you may infect them with poisonous views. So, if you happen to avoid extermintation, I will feel better because you will be sterilized.
2006-08-31 23:38:05 · answer #2 · answered by Slimsmom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler had a dream that aft the apocalypse a race of people came out of tunnels in the ground. these people had blond hair, blue eyes, where very intelligent, and extremely strong for they're size. they were NOT the white race, that crap came in when the KKK jumped on the band waggon. i have blond hair, blue eyes, I'm 37 and look 25, I'm 115 lbs and leg press 500. i have been a couch potato since i got my licence @ 18. the only area that i don't think i have blood ties to is China. to advance you don't eliminate, you include.
2006-08-31 13:02:09 · answer #3 · answered by crsstar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting. Survival of the fittest.....So you want to take on the job of implementing what should be happening naturally, accoring to Darwins theory? But, why isnet it happening naturally? I dont know...that is another question to be discussed. Is the welfare and medicaid system putting a so called "dam" on the natural happenings of evolution? Or is it that we are a symPATHETIC society who does not like to witness the sufferings of other people. Very intersting indeed. Something to be explored.....
2006-08-31 12:55:43 · answer #4 · answered by J. P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think you understand the problems with this.
1. Why is it acceptable to kill someone because of an accident of birth.
2. How do you judge whether someone should survive. If you are going on IQ for example then as IQ is continuously distributed (i.e. whilst one person might be cleverer than another, there is no clear dividing line between stupid, average and intelligent) then whatever cut of point you choose will be arbitrary.
On the same note what characteristics will you use to determine survival.
3. It is difficult, if not impossible to determine to what extent intelligence, fitness and appearance are the result of genetics and to what extent they are the result of the environment.
4. Will any society based on the elimination of the weaker elements really be a better society to live in? For example many autistics are people of great genius.
2006-08-31 12:52:40 · answer #5 · answered by silondan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are ignorant.
Artificial selection would not improve the species because who are you to say what an improvement is? Smarter is not an accurately defined trait, so would it be someone who is book smart? Would it be creative people? What is attractive to you? I find that Asians are nearly irresistible to me, but not everyone holds that opinion.
Eugenics may hold a key to a better future, but if you can improve one person, or even a group of people, you still have natural selection that will decide if the "improvements" are worth keeping.
Just because someone is attractive, or physically fit, or smart does not mean that they will help the species survive or improve.
Sounds like you need to finish Jr. High.
2006-08-31 12:45:57 · answer #6 · answered by wizard8100@sbcglobal.net 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which half are you in, the lower half?! You are in the minority of a disappearing subspecies of humanity. Judging from the point of view of the majority of humanity, blonde people are an anomaly of nature.
2006-08-31 12:41:50 · answer #7 · answered by magnamamma 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets see some of what Hitler was doing was wrong. Your a wack job.
2006-08-31 12:39:20 · answer #8 · answered by redhotboxsoxfan 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
why do you separate people and their actions from nature?
you shouldn't
2006-08-31 12:38:30 · answer #9 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋