diffences in boy’s and girl’s clothes?

Question

What do you notice about the differences in boy’s and girl’s clothes? Does this predispose the child to adult’s perception or their gender? How do you think this affects their development?

Answer 1

Well, with a baby, I think the perception of boys in blue, girls in pink holds true (I once took my son wrapped in a pink blanket to the E/R during an adrenal crisis, and they kept referring to him as a her), but, he was an infant. Secondly, as children get into the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, even 4th grades, their body types can be similar. I was tall and skinny, and wore boys pants in school (the more colorful looking styles). Now, my daughter is wearing boys shorts and tops, as they are cheaper and a size smaller than girls. I did applique some designs on the shirts and tops to make them more "girly". I don't think their development is affected very much, since adults usually keep their opinions of the girls to themselves; it is usually the girls who call other girls prissy or tomboyish. A girls' self-esteem is based on many things, her parent's love and acceptance, peer acceptance, self-confidence, self-awareness, intelligence, nurturing, and kindness by others. Clothing by itself is a minor thing when taken alone in the assessment of development.

Answer 2

If we are talking about children here... I don't think they notice or care... Dressing is more for the adult perception...

What six year old that you can name, notices the difference in the fact that the bottons on his shirt are on the other side compared to the one's on a girls shirt...? I can't.

If you mean ruffles and colors and bows... Dragons and t-shirts and spots teams... They probably notice, but like I said, a child only registers it because of what their parents have told them.

" No billy you can't wear that, that is a girls shirt."

I honestly dont think kids notice or care until the very first time they actually try to take one off... THEN they get it... Usually at or about 15 or 16 years old it REALLY makes sence.

Answer 3

ike Bata or Yakka which final some squillionth of the time. i'm no longer asserting that Pacific manufacturers went around it the perfect way and specific, some sort of equipment might desire to be obtainable for the employees. issues are hard throughout. they at the instant are not the only ones dropping jobs interior the financial down-turn. The mining industry has lost extra jobs because of the fact the crash than Pacific manufacturers does, the version is the media jumped on the Australia Made theory. What can they leap on for the mines?!? If youre gonna stop paying for Pacific manufacturers or insist on paying for Australian then do no longer bypass to Macdonalds or Hungry jacks, or Woolies, or one in all those shops like loopy Clarkes and The Warehouse who specifically sell imported manufacturers and a few of them are literally solid. loopy Clarkes is going into recievership so even nonetheless it places an end to that employer and their imports. which will stop Aussie teenagers having a raffle at after-college artwork and hundreds will lose their jobs, yet howdy, you wont be helping remote places-very own

Answer 4

I really think younger kids don't care what they're wearing, just as long as it has colourful graphics on them.My 1-year-old cousin knows by instinct if he's not wearing a shirt that has no fish on it,he'll cry.
By the time they get older,they'll get more influenced by their friends or older people,and they will see how choosing their own clothes is one of the most important things to think about.And they also tend to like to change their clothing style.

Answer 5

Biggest Difference: $$$

Girls' clothes are more expensive.

Answer 6

um if u give a baby boy girls cloths u could scar him for life just to let u no

Answer 7

Well the buttons are on different sides

Answer 8

Girls are stylish

Answer 9

well, men have hairy legs.