I have the 11th pick, in my league RB- 1point every ten yards and WR-1 point every 15yards. this is on a twelve ten league. Would it be wise of me of going with the best WR in my first two round and scramble for RB in the next to?
2006-08-31 04:45:10 · 10 answers · asked by elpidiomatos 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Go RB-RB if you can, and wait on WR. Your point system devalues WR's, so I wouldn't take one unless there was truly nothing left.
You could land Cadillac and McGahee with your first 2.
2006-08-31 04:50:20 · answer #1 · answered by mikep426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The cardinal rule in fantasy football is that RB will always be the center of the offense. QB are only valuable for passing yards and TD passes, maybe some rushing yards but not much. WR only counts for recieving yards and TD, but that's about it because their is not that much trick play for a WR to rush. Having two RB is like having a good QB, so if you can get two great backs along with a good QB, then that total would likely increase in a week-by-week basis. I would recommend on having two RB pick in the first two rounds because WR is deeper this year. Then how you want to draft after that is up to you.
2006-08-31 06:10:56 · answer #2 · answered by mojo8983 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, go with RB, RB, WR.....as long as the RB are starters and somewhat decent. The format is a joke, RB tend to have more 100 yard games then WR, yet they score for 10 yds while WR score for 15 yds....
2006-08-31 05:10:40 · answer #3 · answered by hawksfan17 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In your first three picks, two of them should be RBs. Your scoring system may boost the points for WRs, but not by enough to make them more valuable than RBs.
2006-08-31 05:04:36 · answer #4 · answered by Dave of the Hill People 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would recommend taking two running backs first since you will most likely not see another decent running back for a while; that is, unless you have a chance of picking the best WR (i.e. Holt, Johnson, etc.). If some putz lets a good RB slip through and you get get him with your second pick, I would do that.
2006-08-31 04:52:57 · answer #5 · answered by flyboop_2000 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, load up on the best RB you can get in the first round. Maybe even the first 2 rounds.
P.S. - Avoid T.O......... Parcells has only had 4 WRs in his 16yr history go over 1,000 yards.
2006-08-31 04:53:23 · answer #6 · answered by Darkman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think most leagues are 20 yards is 1-pt for receiving. If that is the case, then WR are more valuable in your league. Pick them up early.
2006-08-31 04:52:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
rb are hard to come by
2006-08-31 05:17:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup, go RB RB.
2006-08-31 04:54:05 · answer #9 · answered by choonmengat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes i think it would.
2006-08-31 04:48:31 · answer #10 · answered by Arron never walk's alone 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋