WOULD we accept nuclear disarmament if all the worlds none nuclear nations voted to disarm us .?

Question

IF we can decide on our own who is a danger and who is not .Should we not respect the rest of the world and disarm .THATS what democracy is .

Answer 1

You guys really get me over these questions. It's all about the money. Kerr McGee sells reactor fuel. If we let these rag tag 3rd. world nations make their own fuel. What will happen to companies like Kerr McGee.

Do you have any idea how much $-money-$ Kerr McGee gives the RNC every year.

Politics schmolitics it's all about the Cash.

Go big Red Go

Answer 2

even as the Pakistani scientist A Q Khan became latest in 2004 to have secretly offered nuclear guns technologies to Iran, Libya and North Korea, Pakistan became not punished through the U. S.. in the course of the chilly conflict, the Soviet Union became an best chum of India yet extra lately the U. S. has are available direction of India, seeing it as a good, democratic and steadily extra major close by power. It has signaled its attractiveness that India is now a nuclear-armed state. both international locations reached an settlement less than which the U. S. lifted a ban on commerce in civilian nuclear technologies and India agreed to settle for IAEA inspection of its civilian nuclear internet sites. Israel comes less than pressure from different middle East states yet is supported through the united states, which could end any strikes contained in the UN to impose sanctions. The ball is contained in the united states's courtroom hence the alternative for international disarm is rendered profoundly contained in the fingers of human beings in ordinary words human beings can make this dream come actual . a international move in the direction of eliminating nuclear arsenals has been underway for decades and the objective has develop into extra hopeful contained in the submit-chilly conflict era. nevertheless, progression in the direction of abolition seems halting and the direction strewn with daunting obstacles. those obstacles can extremely be conquer if all stipulations to abolition are effectively satisfied. First, there could be settlement on the could haves. 2d, there could be dedication to pursue their success. The project is formerly us. and united states can lead the international out of the so stated as doomsday and keep human civilizations continually!! P/S " What do nuclear-weapon states say about NPT " ?

Answer 3

No.

Human nature being what it is, would you risk that another country could have nuclear weapons and use them as a blackmail method against us?

Democracy does not extend past our borders unless we CHOOSE to let it do so. Our citizens vote (supposedly) on what we can do as a nation...other nations do not do so. We do not recognize the World Court, we barely allow the UN to tell us what to do. In fact the UN is basically only a worldwide opinion poll for the US. We will go against public opinion if necessary.

But considering we provide the lion's share of the money, armaments AND troops for the UN, I'll call that fair.

Answer 4

Who are they, that we should have to answer to them. This country is a soveriegn nation and abides itself by all of the rights there of. Anyways, elimination of all nuclear weapons will only escalate fighting throughout the world - whereas right now they are used as a threat like a strong person showing they're muscles. Those who are dangers to us can change rapidly every decade.

Answer 5

America would never disarm.WE have harmed too many countries for us to ever trust them.

Answer 6

Great Britain voluntarily let their weapons fall into disrepair and obsolescence after WWI. Hitler didn't have the aircraft range and the seagoing ability to invade England, but if he had gotten there the Brits would have been defenseless. They didn't even have small arms to protect themselves and had to beg them from American sportsmen.

Why should Americans give up our well-known nuclear hammer and let others build nuclear weapons for a sneak attack? We know they will do that. That's not democracy, that's stupidity.

Answer 7

Yeah, that's a great idea. Let one of the most powerful nations in the world disarm. I wonder how many countries would then push the red button and bomb the $hit out of us!

Answer 8

Never happen.

Answer 9

We should but we won't.

Answer 10

no