or old slapper?
2006-08-31 02:12:07 · 36 answers · asked by senoirpob 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
wafflebox - if your gonna diss me at least get my name right
2006-08-31 02:24:06 · update #1
Neither.
2006-08-31 02:15:30 · answer #1 · answered by Hello Dave 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Personally I never liked Diana. She came across as vain and self centred and certainly knew how to manipulate the media. Until Charles got fed up of her and they split she did nothing. As soon as she was on her own she had a string of affairs, some of which she admitted in her famous 'po-face' interview that had been going on long into the marriage. Her publicity machine swung into action and withing ten minutes she was suddenly the patron of every charity you could think of. She loved being photographed with handicapped people, those with AIDS and children and every time a 'secret' visit to a hospital or refuge was planned her publicists made damn sure the press were there first. She set out to embarrass the Royal Family as publicly as she could and cultivated her self made 'Saint Diana' and 'People's Princess' image to it's full. Anyone who knows anything about body language can tell how much she loved herself from the many photographs of her always glancing to the side as if making sure that she was being looked at. She was famous for her tantrums and bad behaviour to servants and staff when away from the public eye. In my opinion the Royal Family made a very, very poor choice when they selected her to be Charles' wife.
I must admit that I didn't want her to end up as she did. I wouldn't wish that on anybody but princess of the people? Not for me.
2006-08-31 06:55:23 · answer #2 · answered by quatt47 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You must be joking!,princess of the people my foot ,a vain, self centred woman who played to the press,as for being a slapper, she had been banged more times than a pub door.
2006-09-03 05:53:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A dreadfull self serving woman. Slapper? I can imagine what the boys had to put up with at school; "Who's your mother shagging this week Wales?".
After the Bashir interview, the pundits described her as mentally unstable. After her divorce settlement she announced that if her allowance was going to be cut then she would substantially cut back on her charity work. The only 'charity' work she did was that which attracted most publicity.
2006-08-31 08:10:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She was a young girl who married a man who wasn't faithful to her. I see a lot of people call her names like "slapper" - what does that make her husband????
She has children. Please show some respect. Would you like it if your mother was called those names?
I think she was misguided and desperate. Got into deep water with Charles and Camilla and didn't know how to get out of it. If she was an actress, then she was a darn good one. So much for being stupid.
2006-09-04 01:33:53 · answer #5 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Applying the law of the excluded middle is not always the best course. I never knew her never wanted to. Anyone who would team up with every villages idiot 'Charlie' must have some screws in need of tightening but an old slapper? Nah I don't think so. But there again who cares?
2006-08-31 06:23:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
that they had their own individual strengths; that's problematic to make certain. besides the undeniable fact that Grace substitute into initially somewhat bit a 'female' (in case you be responsive to what I recommend), she actual rose to the occasion while she grew to alter right into a royal. She substitute into regal, elegant, and captivating. Diana wasn't 'elegant' lots. Her endless affairs and tell tale behaviours permit her down, yet her attractiveness substitute into user-friendly.
2016-12-14 15:25:36 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither really... she did some good stuff for charity but so do lots of people. She was a populist icon, and to do that in the first place, you have to be an "empty signifier" - basically, she was "all things to all people" by not really being anything concrete in herself, by not saying anything original, but just being a catch-all figure for rebellion against Evil Authority (the Royal Family). She showed up at hospital bedsides and so the cameras followed her, and that's great, but did she have any ideas of her own? And it seems to have spawned the nauseous self-heroising of Bono, Brad and Angelina, etc.
It fascinated me how people who never gave her a second thought before latched on to her "tragedy" as a way to get attention for themselves, as an outlet to channel their own emotional need for some drama. I got called callous for not signing a condolence book for her. Like she would have cared if I had!
2006-08-31 03:44:45 · answer #8 · answered by comradelouise 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
She was definitely the people's princess because of the humanity efforts she was apart of. That stupid Camilla could never hold a candle to Diana
2006-08-31 07:23:59 · answer #9 · answered by katlvr125 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
well now the only thing she is princess of is princess of a pine box and a six foot by three foot plot of land....we all end up worm food so why waste time worrying about what the royal inbreds are up to?
2006-08-31 10:57:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bit of a wierdo Im afraid, Never understood the Princess of the People bit, what did she do really apart from winge when she was in the papers for shagging another nob?
2006-08-31 03:27:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋