In your eyes was Michael Jackson guilty or not guilty of the child molestation charges that were against him?
2006-08-31 01:19:57 · 43 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
In my opinion, Michael is innocent, because it is so easy to pin a false guilt on a major rich public star in the media limelight...
I have watched Michael grow up before my eyes during my lifetime, and he has never been known to lie and has no cause to...
People always want a piece of the action when it involves a major star...
2006-08-31 01:35:03 · answer #1 · answered by aspenkdp2003 7 · 9⤊ 2⤋
Giving you an unbiased answer, I do believe that Michael Jackson is not guilty of the child molestation charges.
Without looking into his personal character, his actions, his love for children (innocent or not)... looking purely at the evidence... Michael Jackson had to be found not guilty.
There was no evidence that Michael Jackson either molested those children and even had the intent to do so. There was also no evidence that Michael gave those children alcohol or even conspired to hold them against their will.
In this case, the law did have a blind eye (regardless of Michael's superstar) and it worked. Unfortunately, public opinion has warped the definition of a trial and law particularly for superstars... that we automatically assume that they commited these crimes.
Does Michael show characteristics of a child molester, yes. Sad but true. But in the case that was brought against him, did the evidence (testimony of employees and accuser and family and past history) show that such crimes were committed no.
2006-08-31 17:25:07 · answer #2 · answered by Marcus W 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Michael Jackson was not guilty of the child molestation charges that were against him.
2006-08-31 01:24:01 · answer #3 · answered by Louise Smith 7 · 8⤊ 1⤋
He definitely was not guilty on the charges up against. Thomas Sneddon, the district attorney for Santa Barbara, California. Never had a case to begin with anyways. He cares way too much about the children of the world to even consider doing such a thing. I love you so much Michael!!!
2006-09-03 09:17:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Michael Jackson is not guilty, he is INNOCENT and he would never hurt a child or someone! They don't tell u how much he donate money for kids and other things, they just find some rumor and spread that, but good thing about him they don't spread. I LOVE MICHAEL!
2006-08-31 10:03:50 · answer #5 · answered by Stranger on Earth™ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Definitely NOT! He would never do anything to hurt a child because he knows what that's like! The parents of the last accuser even gave an interview that Michael was never alone with their children months before they accused him! The parents also had a history of suing people (they sued J.C. Penny for abusing them after they made their kids shoplift)!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-08-31 23:55:37 · answer #6 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
He may not have been guilty of the charges that were specifically brought against him but there was nothing non-damaging going on in that house for children. If he wasn't molesting them under the letter of the law he was surely doing just as much damage to them.
2006-08-31 01:23:18 · answer #7 · answered by W0LF 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Its quite possible that there was some truth to those allegations but justice was skewed by the alleged victims 'greed'. Frankly, if he did mollest them then it is the parents fault. What real parent who has their child's best interest in mind lets them stay with a complete stranger (even a celebrity like MJ)?/ it was all about the money. They literally sold their kids, if he is guilty, he is only guilty of seizing opportunity as it literally 'knocked on his door'. But however it happened it was wrong! terribly terribly wrong! The man is messed up.
2006-08-31 01:23:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Not guilty...ive always believed he was innocent!...He may be a bit "weird" as people say about him, but a child molester, never!!
2006-08-31 01:24:22 · answer #9 · answered by wee_wifey2000 1 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Not guilty by reason of wealth. I loved his music in the 80s though.
2006-08-31 01:24:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋