It depends on what do we mean by victory.
Israel destroyed Lebanon without too many casualties and probably prevented terror attacks from Lebanon's direction.
On the other hand, Hezbollah is more popular than ever, and Israel lost the world's sympathy in case of Lebanon.
2006-08-31 00:42:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What Bush means is Israel Will be the Winner. Hezbollah as nothing to offer America, unlike Israel which remains a thorn in the side of the Arab World and a backdoor into the Middle East.
2006-09-01 10:38:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Stephen 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
When Bush says something... well at least my alarm bells go off! No I don't agree with him at all, so many children and innocent people died, that it is a real sick comment to make Israel is the winner... of what killing kids? At war no winners only loosers
2006-08-31 00:26:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is a t**t. He has a brain smaller than a peanut. He cannot see that he is being manipulated by Israel. There will be no peace in the Middle East unless that changes, and unless America stops thinking it can take-over countries and force its own doctines upon them.
Terriorism will increase as the dominated arabs have no other way. How would you react if someone bombed your country and told you how to live!
2006-08-31 20:31:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by fionavb 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry since when are people's lives, war and countries a game?
No, seriously I absolutely and totally disagree with that. Israel is the winner?! They kill people and start wars and they're considered the "winners" ?!
This is ridiculous.
2006-08-31 02:17:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Katy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. Anyone with common sense, even Israelis themselves would know not to agree with anything Bush says. He's an idiot, just like the people who voted for him. He's sided with the Israelis, so he's a very biased person, anyway, and by making judgements like that he assumes that the Israelis have already won because he's helping them. He's very inconsiderate, because he's failed to think about the conditions of the Lebanese and Palestinian people. He's anti-Muslim, we all know that, and if he completely had his own way I bet he'd burn every Muslim on the entire planet.
2006-08-31 00:33:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by hawaiian_shorts91 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am israeli and I definatly feel like we didnt win this war...
I dont think that you can actually ever win a war. War starts with every side having targets and you either accomplish your targets or you dont.
In this last war israel accomplished alot but not the targets that were set from the beginning. I feel like we accomplished but we accomplished **** because its not exactly what we wanted and its just an excuse not to turn out loosers.
Our two soldiers our captured, we lost millions of sollars and hundreds of lives. all the lives we lost were brave young soldiers, they were heros and israels or lebanons targets were not worth their lives.
This war was a waste of time money and energy, Nobody won.
2006-08-31 01:57:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by chnuna 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush supports war and weapons. Every time there's an attack, he's the one to support it. There was no oil in Iraq, he just had the opportunity to war and went for it.
By the way, did you know that people that vote for Bush are the ones with the low IQ? Really, people are stupid to vote for him. Didn't they see what destruction he has brought everywhere on the planet?
2006-08-31 00:34:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's as much chance of the Arabs and Israelis living peacefully together as there is the Hindu and Moslem in the Indian subcontinent.
In other words, give it time, and don't escalate relatively minor incidents (2 soldiers kidnapped) into a major conflicy (over 1000 Lebanese KILLED)
2006-08-31 03:23:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by andigee2006 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I get that amount of money that Bush gets from Jewish banks I would say the same thing.
I don't know how some Americans do not see what's going on, that their money is used for founding wars. Are they stupid or something?
2006-08-31 00:35:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by bizkit_ 3
·
1⤊
0⤋