English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Notice lately, Bush, Rumsfeld, Snow, etc STOPPED using the word "terrorists" and rephrased it? There is a reason for this.

2006-08-30 22:45:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

it's called bush coverin hiz azz

2006-08-30 22:47:31 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Shortie♥ 5 · 0 0

This is a new strategy to create a flavor of the month Boogie man to keep our attention. We have yet to hear a comprehensive explanation for what the hell that is(Islamic-Fascist). Todate we as inadequate children have been advised that we are "morally confused" and "donot under stand the threat". But I submit to you that Americans are well educated and are capable of digesting much more that what we are getting credit for. More rhetoric from behind the smokescreen of the wizard of Oz.
And notice the hypnotized following who immediately "parrot" the suggestions of the hypnotist:when told that there is a pink elephant that is the next terrorist - they will see a pink elephant and with relish!

2006-08-30 23:19:45 · answer #2 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 0 0

Its called projection, one of Roves favorite tricks.Project the negative thing you are(Fascist)on to the enemy.(it helps confuse everybody).Also they realized people were getting wise to the fact that terrorism is a tactic,not an enemy.I recommend everybody look up the meaning of the word Fascist.It has to do with corporations taking over and running the government.Islam Muslims or Arabs,(whatever the word of the day is)have a RELIGIOUS IDEOLOGY.which has nothing to do with fascism.hope this helps.

2006-08-30 23:05:09 · answer #3 · answered by UnSpun 2 · 0 0

As agendas change, so do their fav words. Probly gonna play a lil more role in the Iraqi political arena. The Iraqi gov. probly lookin to make some deals that dont go over favoerably with the U.S. administration.
Thus 'Damn fascists'.

2006-08-30 22:52:55 · answer #4 · answered by DelusionRoad 3 · 0 0

I saw it first in the Wall Street Journal OpEd page a while back.

It stuck with me too as it is a much better description than simply Fundamentalist or Militant Islamist.

2006-08-30 22:56:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

bush also used the term crusaders when he invaded Iraq. but he is loosing the war and his boys r dying everyday. he can uses any term that he wants but he wont win the war. to me this American government is leading the planet to disasters.

2006-08-30 23:05:43 · answer #6 · answered by khalidhamed 2 · 0 0

When they realized they fit the description terrorism perfectly they're now backtracking

2006-08-30 22:48:01 · answer #7 · answered by Ya-sai 7 · 0 0

does it matter? they are muslim extremists who hate the wesy and want to impose their way of life the rest of the world, or cut our heads off. If you don't think they are so bad, go to Lebanon and give them a visit. See if they like you.

2006-08-31 01:26:47 · answer #8 · answered by pilotB 3 · 0 0

I agree with the previous author. It is one of Bush's covering his shitt.

2006-08-30 22:49:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Terrorism is an act of war Radical Islam is the enemy, they're just un-PCed it!

2006-08-30 23:25:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers