English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

They are stupid. They are trying to control over the world which is not possible.

2006-08-30 22:42:37 · answer #1 · answered by Vins 2 · 0 1

Because in the old days, you had two super powers Russia and the U.S. - then we asked Russia or the USSR and all comunist countries to agree that life would be better if the US was the super power and we would allow little countries (our allies) to have nukes on an "as needed" basis, feeling quite content that no one would piss off their country people by developing such horrible weapons thereby substantiating our role as the number 1 super power. What we didn't count on was that other countries really may not like us! And they were out of that treaty loop. And they really didn't like us!!! So they developed away, aided and abetted by spies and such. And you have one President that thinks "well ok everyone has a right to defend their country, not too much but some" Then you get a cowboy as a president and he says "I will kill you if you even think of defying me! ME! ME! the leader of the free world!!!!" Well, shoot now I'm ready to build nuclear weapons, because it's not a great idea to bully and taunt another country that has a lot of money and a whole lot of oil which buys a lot of secrets. So America may have overstepped the boundaries just a tad 'cuz now the people who wanted nukes and wanted to point them to the guys next door (Iran vs Iraq, Pakistan vs whomever) are now pointing them towards us. (

2006-08-30 22:53:43 · answer #2 · answered by Sidoney 5 · 4 0

the U. S. is a hypocritical united states of america, and also you'll imagine that less than the words of the NPT Iran could be allowed to develop and use non violent nuclear technologies. even with the undeniable fact that, the NPT is fatally incorrect, Iran may not be in any respect truthful. they'll probably cheat and make nuclear guns, and it really is available that Iran already has nukes besides (bought on the black marketplace on the time Ukraine gave Russia back the nukes (there are some comments on the Russian internet about that.)) That stated, nukes at the on the spot are not "good" for every person. ALL international locations could abolish their nuclear guns. this is all about MAD (at the same time certain destruction.) Iran could supply it up, and so could Israel and the U. S. and anybody else. Will they contained in the close to destiny? very nearly genuinely not, exceptionally as nuclear power turns into extra low-priced. it is an extremely gentle situation and regrettably we contained in the U. S. have squandered our good will global, because of Curious George and his cronies. it type of sounds like they have not shown themselves to be powerfuble in concerns of international kin and overseas coverage both. probably no individual is going to love this, yet i do not extremely care. i imagine all overseas help in that portion of the international (including Israel) could be contingent on assembly said aims about disarmament and making progression in the direction of peace and an autonomous Palestinian state.

2016-12-06 00:53:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Big brother mentality just like the H.K triad society. Staffer competition and you become the "Big Brother". Anybody else who harbour a mere desire of nuclear interest becomes a threat.
So Iran & N.Korea are a threat and "springboard of evil" - forgot Bush term. How about other nuclear powers like China and Russia. Are they a threat too? No.! Why not? because as long as you lisent to Big Brother, you are ok. But in the final analysis,
you cannot have " two tigers in a hill" - as a Chinese saying goes.

.

2006-08-30 23:02:41 · answer #4 · answered by Roti-Prata 3 · 1 0

I really don't think it does think so. If you look at the history of disarmerment between US/ USSR or present day Russia, there is a steady process of reducing nuclear weapons with objectives to removing the arsenal totally. There had been many advocates including anti-nuclear civil groups that partner UN in reaching this objectives and setting the tone of the agenda. The collapse of USSR mean partnering with one country to wipe out these weapons & its tech-know how suddenly become diversified & without central control, and ending up with people under other influences and rougue agendas. This led to major powers seeking to finance the destruction of these suddenly scattered nuclear fragments & powers. The onenus centred upon the United States through its economic power to induce emerging countries under the CIS with tech-know how & nuclear potentials to tow the disarmerment line, supported by allied principles scattered across the sphere of the former communists & capitalist capitals now fused together in unity to combat the scurge. Incidentally along the way, other interest with strict cultural & religious complication see the opportunities to individually own these abilities, giving no-regard to continutation of disarmerment pyramid through the former two superpower structures, knowing at the back of our mind that these same emerging sub-influences are covered by the treaty ot communist-capitalist coldwar confrontation. The only power remaining, given the approval to monitor controlling the preponderence of nuclear fragments also suddenly has to contend with combating these new threats that seek to unleash what the whole UN giuded disarmerment structure was setup to resolve initially. I can but wonder why civil anti-nuclear groups that was so luid through the 70s, 80s, and 90s have suddenly become so silent and not talking on BBC and CNN on why India, Pakistan, Iran, North Korea, France, CIS etc must not keep their arsenal but destroy it IMMEDIATELY, and to campaign for the restarting of the UN guided disarmerment process between the US and Russia as last steps to barnishing the weapons from our world. My only concern is, people tend to blame America forgetting the principles of disarmerments and the need to disallow humanity from acting like the salmonella bacteria that get so greedy, consume all the meat while creating heavy waste in the process (toxin) that will eventually kill it under its own waste. My question to everybody is, will humanity continue to blame America instead of face the facts and end up killing itself?

2006-08-30 23:22:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

What the hell are you talking about.

Most of Europe, China, Russia and more all develop Nuclear Power.

2006-08-30 22:47:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

We don't. Other responsible countries use nuclear power. It's the countries that don't fear a nuclear winter that we don't want to have the technology.

2006-08-30 22:44:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because being a world power is not easy. They have the responsibility not to use them unnecesary. How you like a bunch of suicide bombers who have acces to nuclear power running around our Countrys and towns. Ta.

2006-08-30 22:44:22 · answer #8 · answered by Douglas R 1 · 0 1

Because a Muslim nation under the satanic influence of Islam that is sworn to wipe out every Non-Muslim off the face off the Earth beginning with the Jews in Israel and then the USA...well
I'd say that's a very good reason for starters.

2006-08-30 22:56:10 · answer #9 · answered by B'klyn Barracuda 3 · 0 2

The entire world has just one cop. That cop thinks he only needs all weapons.

2006-08-30 22:44:26 · answer #10 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 0 0

It is because North American's think that they are the "WOOORLD". Just look at heavyweight boxing champions, Star footballers, movie stars, scientists, THEIR SELF OPINIONATED MONEY GRABBING CHURCHS, The Bill Gates fiasco of owning the Japanese instigated internet, etc., THE YANKEE DOODLE DANDEES REALLY THINK THAT THEY ALONE ARE THE "WOOORLD'. The rest of us are non entitities to them!!!!

2006-08-30 23:07:38 · answer #11 · answered by Scrubber 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers