i mean when i saw that creature on tv i could just tell he loved the attention. and what about this dna that did not match, they said patsy and the father both tested negative, so i assume that means the brother could not be involved either, because wouldn't it have shown some sort of marker in the dna, that would show the dna was related to jobennet, this whole thing is so weird and confusing, i have never discussed this before, so what are some of you guys theories?
2006-08-30 22:20:53 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Most people in the US are mob thinkers, gullible and highly suggestible. When Karr was the hot suspect, they were more than willing to suspend disbelief regardless of the evidence of their own eyes that he was a publicity-seeker who wanted out of Thailand in the worst way--the penalties there for his predelictions are much worse than here.
Now that the authorities have discarded Karr, of course the same rabble will give you lots of reasons why they thought he was a fake.
For people who form their opinions based on whatever evidence is available and don't change that opinion simply because authorities say so, this is confusing.
2006-08-30 22:29:21 · answer #1 · answered by nora22000 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I never that that weirdo was guilty, he's just a part-time transvestdite (pre-op) trying to get some publicity and attention reguardless if its negative or positive. If you ask me, the mother was so guilty she died from it! Her story was so inconsistant and she was the one wearing the pants of the house because the father was just a big douche bag- push-over.
2006-08-31 01:58:12 · answer #2 · answered by superbad~honeydip 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Ramsey case will join the Simpson case as examples of procedural errors of historic proportions. Trampled or planted evidence. Incompetence at the highest levels.
Karr is a sick puppy.
2006-08-30 22:50:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Thing is me and a friend were sitting on the couch smoking a blunt and that guy came on. We both say why do people actually think he did it it's obvious that he didn't really kill her. Then Honest to God 30 seconds later on the news they say charges are dropped on Karr and we started to flip out yo.
2006-08-30 22:24:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think he just couldn't afford the trip back to America lol. So Uncle Sam was told to foot the bill.
2006-08-30 22:27:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I probably shouldn't respond to this, but originally my overwhelming gut instinct said it was the mom. I don't know what I think anymore. It is a sad story. I don't want to think about it.
2006-08-30 22:31:05 · answer #6 · answered by Kiki 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nah he was just looking for attention and publicity!! Just like you said so you hit the nail on the head!
2006-08-30 22:22:52 · answer #7 · answered by lildevilchild_87 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am struggling with parents who would dress their 6 year old up as a beauty queen and exploit her in front of millions of people.
She was a child for god sake!
2006-08-30 22:28:07 · answer #8 · answered by A G 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No. I think he has a lot of psychological problems and wants the attention.
2006-08-30 22:27:06 · answer #9 · answered by starrynight1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, his story didnt make sense. he is a faker and hopefully he will get some prison justice when he does time for those child porn charges
2006-08-30 22:26:24 · answer #10 · answered by Chad 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋