English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-30 21:54:43 · 29 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5 in Politics & Government Politics

29 answers

History will almost certainly judge him as the worst person to have ever held the office. Spin (another word for much less than the truth) was the start. Then the corruption of the honours system, the loans scandal and all the rest of the shennanigans.

The health service reforms commit future governments to huge debts for a few political gains for this government!

When in opposition Labour called for resignations the moment a tory slipped in the slightest way and they called it sleaze. Labour and particularly Blair have refused point blank to fire their miscreants and have bent over backwards to protect them.

Count the number of investigations that have been started where criminal actions have taken place! Fiddling of expenses, false claims for allowances and what happened? They were asked to pay the money back. Any other citizen in this country would have been charged and convicted!! Of course there are still criminal investigations going on by the police and I suspect there will be others before long if Blair does not go soon.

Look at John Prescot! There is not a politician in the opposition parties that would have the brass neck to stay in office if they had been found out for half of what he has done. Blair is again bending over backwards to protect him. Mind you Prescot is supposed to have boasted that he has the goods on all the labour MPs so it is not surprising!

I have no doubt that one day this government will be proved to have been the first totally corrupt one the country has had and that blair as it's leader will be shown as the architect of it all.

Don't you think all this corruption is going to force labour back in the wilderness for decades to come when the truth comes out?

Blair and sincerity? The only sincerity is that used by the conman as he takes your money and all your possessions!

2006-08-30 22:22:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Gosh yes,right from day one! Mr Blair is an excellent actor and orator,and most British people fell for it, until now.....................
The thesis that Tony Blair is honest and sincere, is very mistaken. Hopefully the agony of a Labour Government,the lies and spin,will soon come to an end! Do we want Blair number two?? He's already waiting in the wings, in the disguise of David Cameron. When the time comes to vote,PLEASE don't put Blair number two into number 10!!!!

2006-08-30 22:41:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

However sincerely they may embark on a career in politics the nature of all political systems will corrupt even the best.
Blair like a lot of those in Westminster was a mediocre lawyer and in order to strengthen his own position has like the rest of them sold out his ethics to the highest bidders. Bush, Big Business, The Unions. (Just wait and see what he will earn on the lecture tours and after dinner speaking tours when he leaves No 10, for a socialist Prime Minister he will be a most capitalist socialist) He is no different, better or worse than the rest of them, they all vacillate to whomsoever will make them richer more influential or powerful. They should each be shot every morning (not killed just hurt) just to remind them they are there to serve us, not rule us.

2006-08-30 22:19:02 · answer #3 · answered by bear 1 1 · 1 0

Tony Blair replaced his faith like i alter underpants. He converted to Roman Catholicism now possibly he's gazing islam, even nonetheless I doubt it. many human beings study the koran very regularly, they try this to appreciate the inaccuracies and contradictions, the lies and violent hatred that it is composed of. I even have regularly study the koran, frequently while i might desire to combat hearth with hearth, that's a e book that would desire to be study by ability of all customary human beings so as that they might understand how that's little extra effective than a dreadfully corrupted and perverted version of the Judeo/Christian faith.

2016-11-06 03:21:37 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Not since breakfast, but i am about to.

Tony Blair is nothing but the lapdog of George W(orthless) Bush. Tony wants to be in the big league and play with the big boys. That is why the bombs went off in the underground and the bus. It was payback time for Tony to be Bush's henchman.

2006-08-30 22:03:51 · answer #5 · answered by The answer man 4 · 1 1

I do not think that his sincerity is in question. I do sometimes think that there are ulterior motives for actions, which are known about all the way to the top of Government.

Sometimes this requires a leader to exaggerate the facts to the public.

2006-08-30 22:13:28 · answer #6 · answered by James 6 · 0 0

Yes. He was given a chance to improve things after Major's Tories were exposed as corrupt. Almost immediately he adopted tory policies and the rest as they say is history. English people are now derided and hated because of his blind obedience to his master Bush. Arrogance and sincerity are a contadiction in terms in his case.

2006-08-30 22:10:01 · answer #7 · answered by Tallboy 4 · 1 0

he does seem to believe what he says, but to the point of absurdity. In face of massive public resentment and the opposition of his own party, he ploughs ahead regardless with his dangerous foreign policy. That's not a good form of sincerity, that's misguided and deluded. Some of the papers are even starting to refer to him as psychotic because he's so single-minded and won't listen to reason. He's willing to invade other countries to impose democracy on them but he won't operate democracy within his own party and political system.

2006-08-30 22:06:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He could`nt lie straight in bed. Useless bas*ard, same as all the rest, In it for the money. Blair and Bush should be tried for war crimes, pair of very dangerous maniacs.

2006-08-30 22:12:10 · answer #9 · answered by dingdong 4 · 2 0

Oh yes - about as sincere as George W Bush NOT wanting the oil in Iraq......

2006-08-31 02:26:36 · answer #10 · answered by aleows 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers