I wouldn't need to ask 40,000+ people in a stadium to take a picture of the stadium, would I? People appear in pictures all the time without permission, whether it be in the background or wherever. At what point does permission become legally necessary?
2006-08-30 20:48:01 · 6 answers · asked by CyberTootie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
in a group setting, like down at the Dog Pound, no. you wouldn't need permission from all 2,000 drunken Browns fans. (GO BROWNS) i think its more of a personal setting that requires permission, and only if you're going to use it in mass publication or to sell a product.
2006-08-30 20:52:27 · answer #1 · answered by Terry Legendary 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it becomes a legal issue when it's a child you're wanting to take a picture of. You wouldn't need permission at a stadium.
2006-08-31 03:52:40 · answer #2 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The person must be identifiable to start with. 3 pixels in the background does not result in an identifiable image.
2006-08-31 04:18:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on ur use of a privilege given to u . It comes with the set of responsibilities .
2006-08-31 04:33:05 · answer #4 · answered by s_k_latif 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it will surely depends on d administration your workin for.
there are certain areas/places that they prohibit takin pics &
protected by copyrights...well, below is the link regarding the copyright rules on takin pics:
2006-08-31 04:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by i crave yours 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is simple good manners.
2006-08-31 03:51:04 · answer #6 · answered by suzanne 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋