Circumsized men can last longer during sex. This makes their wives happier. Circumsiztion reduces risk of AIDS, this should make the wife happy too.
2006-08-30 19:55:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Not all that sure on the African revelations there. But yea uncircumsized feel pleasure too. I mean they have sex the same way as well. Just the foreskin draws back to reveal the more sensitive penis skin underneath. If anything the foreskin is just a shield to protect the penis from dieases and stuff like that.
2006-08-31 04:18:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bloody Kisses 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm one of those guys you talked about who was circumcised by a mob. My wife told her family that my penis looked like a dog's. Her brothers told everyone else. Then as I was coming home from work one day, almost the entire village descended on me. They had sharp stones. They not only circumcised my penis, but also my opposable thumbs and my big toes. At the time, I found it to be somewhat upsetting. But now I can satisfy five women at once with my circumcised parts.
2006-08-31 03:10:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by beast 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, that is just an old wives tale about not having as much pleasure with an uncircumcised male. I've had both, and the sensation was no different for me with either, and they both were extremely satisfied. its just tradition whether or not someone is circumcised.And as for forcing a husband to get circumcised, that is yet another, albeit barbaric, tradition.
2006-08-31 02:56:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Wasn't' that Abraham's idea? I'm not sure God wanted anyone to do it. (What was that old man thinking at the time?) Did he have his dick in his hand as he was praying? Was he thinking of his dick when God was clearly near-by? Did he say to himself: "Yeah, that would hurt the most. I'll do it for God!" (What if he had cut off his left nipple instead? Those are pretty useless on a guy.) Maybe he thought: "I've got to out-do those Amazons. After all, those pagan women cut off their right tit for their faith, I've got to one-up them."
I think God just shook his head when Abraham came up with that one. "Oh yeah, let's circumcise every male. That way we can tell the "Chosen" people from the unenlightened ones." er, good one, Abe. What do you do? Check out every guy's penis before you talk to them?
"Okay guys, if you wanna talk to me, whip it out and give me a gander at that package. Got to check out if you're brave enough for God."
2006-08-31 03:10:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shinigami 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Men who are uncircumsized still fill the pleasure. They just have to be more clean.
2006-08-31 02:57:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
no, guys who are not cut give better pleasure to the woman when they have sex. The extra skin rubs their pussy and give extra sensations to the woman during sex, not to mention better for the man.
The Africa thing doesn't have to do with sex, but with rituals. That is so ignorant to inforce something on someone , expecially when it involves something that is your body and still even, your personal parts.
2006-08-31 02:58:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mat 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
probably a non issue considering the women have been thru genetalia modification/ mutilation. the clitoris is removed by a senior female family member as a rite of passage. the women aren't enjoying it, circumsized or no.
2006-08-31 03:00:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
those uncircumsized men were unclean . . . if i were 2 pick a husband. . i'd rather choose the one who has been circumsized. .
2006-08-31 02:56:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by 'Lil bhEb 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am uncircumsized and have had no complaints. I am a swinger.
2006-08-31 02:57:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by darksphyx 5
·
1⤊
0⤋