English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Keep in mind, those mother*@!#$ had it coming, and the soliders signed up to be in the military, there is no draft, and the soliders were not complaing recieving money from the govt. - Now, there actually doing there job and what they trained for. I am 100% positive, no one said they would never be called in for duty. )

2006-08-30 19:37:07 · 11 answers · asked by risaNaldo 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

I can't give an opinion on that @sshole without using foul language.

2006-08-30 19:42:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

First of all, Iraq did nothing to deserve this war. The sanctions imposed by the U.S. for ten years, crippled Iraq financially. A lot of people were literally starving. Saddam was not allowed to sell oil, so people had no food, and no medicine. There was no money to purchase wmd's. Yes, Saddam was a terrible person, that the Americans brought to power in Iraq. The govt. thought they still had wmd because we sold them to Iraq during the 8yr. war with Iran. We also went behind Iraq's back and sold weapons to Iran. The money from the weapons sold to Iran was funneled to Nicaragua to aid the Contra's against the Sandinistan govt. the the U.S. was trying to take out at the time. Bush had this agenda upon entering office. He just used 9/11 as an excuse. Osama bin Laden is Saudi, living in afganastan. He does not like the U.S. because of our relationship with Isreal. Suddam was a Sunni and Osama is a shia, they were not coconspirators. Many young people go into the milatary as a way to pay for college, or because they are poorly educated. Yes they recieve money from the govt. but not much. The young men and women dying in Iraq didn't sign up for a false war. I despise President Bush. He is as ignorant as they come. His IQ is a single digit, I'm sure, despite the boughten degree that he has from Yale.

2006-08-30 20:02:59 · answer #2 · answered by Maria Conchita 2 · 1 0

After reading some of the comments and descriptions of our President, I am inclined toward believing that most of the writers are not Americans but are English-speaking Iranians who have infiltrated into this country for the purpose of disaffecting our people.

The hatred of the writers is real and not something that develops over political differences. The vitriolic comments are unbelievable as coming from American citizens.

If I felt that way about my country, I would not stay here, I would leave and find another place to live.

2006-09-02 17:44:44 · answer #3 · answered by Mr.Been there 3 · 0 0

He's a usurper with a conglomerate of cronies who placed him in office, including his brother, and is part of the military-industrial complex which Eisenhower warned us against, as they have made warmongering into a financial enterprise. He's using propaganda (Iraqi WMDs), doublespeak (Anyone who opposes me is not a patriot, tricks (changing the draft of the Patriot Act the night before it was to be voted upon) and exceeding his power (Guantanamo no Geneva convention for prisoners, spying without court orders, signing statements on bills). He's also a puppet, seems inarticulate, is on vacation all the time, is a bible thumping idiot, said atheists shouldn't have the same rights as Christians, and multiple other instances of complete and utter shitte.

2006-08-30 19:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Hmm, the Conan O'brien George Bush impersonator could be better... Though, usually the voice acting is quite poor. I think the real problem is with the original, whose speeches are quite boring (except for words like EVIL, TERRORISM and so on), and really have no meat in them. It's like someone told him to have a speech and then tell him that he has to try to focus on this, suggest that and say this... But to do so in his own words.

2006-08-30 19:45:33 · answer #5 · answered by dane 4 · 0 0

in my dictionary GEORGE WALKER BUSH- evil, antichrist , was behind 9/11, is carrying out the new world order his father had an announcement about exactly 10 yrs before 9/11, he's a liar , he makes devil hand signs, is losing trust of america , lying about war on terror, covering up 9.11, says he's above the law after commiting felonies of paying off news reporters, lied about seeing the first plane hit the tower when it wasnt even on t.v that day, cheated the election in 2000, getting soldiers killed for no reason......etc

2006-08-30 19:44:43 · answer #6 · answered by forzaitalia232569 2 · 2 2

He is a moron he could have stop 9/11 before it happend did he NO do you think that make him smart FU CK no!!!

2006-08-31 05:22:41 · answer #7 · answered by loriaburton 2 · 1 0

He is a lying sack of ****. The "mother*@!#$" you mentioned were almost all military drones, many of them conscripts. Many more civilians have died both by the hands of our military and the "insurgents." We have started a war that was none of our business, and one we can not win.

2006-08-30 19:43:18 · answer #8 · answered by Nathan 3 · 2 2

I think he's one twisted mother ******. He's not fixing our problems, he's only making them worse.

2006-08-30 20:49:27 · answer #9 · answered by munkees81 6 · 2 0

You still call him a president?

2006-08-30 19:44:08 · answer #10 · answered by Fortified Live 1 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers