Were the World Trade Center attacks an "inside job"?

Answer 1

Without the slightest doubt.
There is no way can jet fuel burn hot enough to melt steel, so the only way the buildings could collapse was by controlled demolition. That also is the only way they could have fallen at the speed of free fall, and without toppling to one side. In the whole history of the world, no steel framed building has collapsed as a result of fire, yet on 9/11 three buildings collapsed, all at free fall, with no toppling over, and one of the (WTC7) wasn't even hit by a plane.
Additionally, how come 7 of the so called hijackers are still alive today. Because there were no hijackers. The whole thing was a very carefully planned exercise in order to gain the sympathy of the gullible American citizens to enable war to be made, so that the rich oil people could take control of Middle Eastern Oil.
No Muslim involvement whatever. The whole government story is a complete hoax. Anyone needing further facts and details is welcome to contact me.

Answer 2

most likely. if not an inside job, it was allowed to happen (which is just as bad, in my opinion). if you look at most of the "debunking 9/11 conspiricy myth" websites/articles, most of them fail to offer any counter-evidence for the theories that the govt allowed the attacks, and subsequently used them as an excuse to invade iraq.

check out a book called "Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster" by David Icke. if you've heard of him, ignore whatever you were told about him- this book is quite different from his others. he breaks down the official version of the events and shows that, if examined rationally, the official version "insults the intelligence of a 10 year old" (there are many other resources for similar research, but this is probably the best i've come across, personally.)

Answer 3

We now have audiotapes from the 4th plane, the names of all the terrorists aboard the two WTC planes, and their links to training in the US and in Bin Laden's camp. The attacks also had a large negative impact on the U.S. economy.

Those who argue Bush is behind the WTC attacks needs to step back and take a look at all the available information. Just because he has been a rather bellicose and unpopular president does not make it likely nor even plausible that he would do such a thing.

Answer 4

No. If it was, somebody would have filed indictments against everybody in the Federal gov't. Life is not an Oliver Stone movie. And don't you think that there woulda been some gungho congressperson who would have LOVED to have brought down the president and prove that he did it so that the congressperson could run for president as the guy who brought down Bush?
C'mon! think about it! It's so unpatriotic and unAmerican to believe that WE killed our own people, and for what? Only OIL??? please. Michael Moore should be hanged.

Answer 5

The WTC attacks were a shameful disgrace, and I feel bad for everyone who were viticimized. However, I would not say its an "inside job."

Answer 6

Yes - from inside the middle east.

Answer 7

Right on Garth

Answer 8

yeah, they 'shot' the planes from inside the buildings outwards...genius idea, really.

no, i don't think our own government, as twisted as it may be, would kill thousands of innocent lives for an excuse. you don't need dead people for an excuse. if 'we' wanted to go over there, we could have for no reason at all...

Answer 9

after seeing all sorts of documentaries about it all, and reading stuff, it makes u think. Yeah i think it was. Gave us an excuse to go over there.

Answer 10

yea...inside da heads of the goverment