Yes he is and their child's name is Aurora Rose Levesque, McMahon is not apart of the baby's name.
2006-08-30 18:29:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Spread Peace and Love 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Also Stephanie has stated in a recent interview that Vince wanted to write a story line where Vince was the father of Stephanie's child. Stephanie said no to this. Then Vince wanted to have Shane as the father and Stephanie once again told her father no. Good thing too, Vince can come up with some lame story lines.
2006-08-31 02:46:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by krkretz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I bet the only reason triple h and stephanies marriage has lasted so long was because triple h knows that if he ever lost the marriage with Stephanie, his wwe career would have been destroyed. But by being with her, his career has escalated more then any other star. Had Stephanie been just another star in the business or not even part of the wwe, I could bet he would still be with chyna or with a different diva. Just brutal honest opinion.
2015-07-08 13:35:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kevin Crouch 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes Paul Levesque (Triple H) is the father of this child Aurora Levesque-McMahon
2006-08-30 18:21:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by AbsoluteMart! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, they are married. I remember seeing there wedding registry on the Williams-Sonoma website. BTW, is the child's name really Levesque-McMahon? It's gotta be the other way around right? Though I could see it like that with the McMahon ego.
2006-08-30 18:32:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by duh 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oh Yeah, The Game is the Father of Princess McMahon's baby! Lucky kid! I think HHH and Steph are good together!
2006-08-31 08:06:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by jenjfrost 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of it is. I even have constantly enjoyed the belief of feuds concerning family, notwithstanding if or not they're kinfolk in kayfabe OR real life in wrestling. It only provides greater intensity and believabilty to the storyline in a feeling IMO. and that i admire how they booked it on uncooked the place he got here out to keep Stephanie from getting kicked interior the face after she had already been RKO'd via Orton. The look of sheer anger on his face after Orton had hauled a** out of the hoop rather had him finding like the real Cerebral murderer for a 2d. yet while they actually could desire to make this feud sturdy, they could desire to have Orton buff up the Legacy a touch greater. The McMahons have Vince, Stephanie, HHH, Shane, and consistent with danger even Linda if she returns on their element. however the Legacy purely has Orton, Rhodes, and DiBiase. this is 4, in all probability 5, on 3. Orton desires to recruit Manu for specific, using fact i might rather desire to work out Shane combat a monster like Manu, and the Legacy desires a great guy besides. and then if Linda have been to come back back, they might want the two DH Smith or Sim Snuka to come back or perhaps out the combat. yet to respond to your question, definite, i think of the disclosing to all of people who did not be responsive to that HHH is an area of the McMahon kinfolk IS for the main suitable of the storyline. COOL actuality- i grew to become into examining on WrestleZone suitable after Paul London have been given released and did every physique else be responsive to that he grew to become into initially meant to be the single feuding with the McMahon kinfolk in this storyline? They have been meant to construct it up after the Million greenback Mania incident the place London grew to become into smiling after the twist of fate and characteristic him using fact the criminal. So in the event that they might have saved London and he could have saved his mouth close at the back of the curtain, Paul London may be in a extensive conflict with the McMahons now, meaning he may be getting a extensive push which might probable bring about some enormous identify reigns interior the destiny. only thought that grew to become into very exciting and concept i might share it with you adult adult males.
2016-10-01 02:59:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-08-31 06:43:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-08-30 18:22:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by mynameisdennis 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes they're married.
2006-08-30 18:17:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Larry 3
·
0⤊
0⤋