Is the U.S. Policy Hurting The War on Terrorism?

Question

More than 56% of Americans believe that Bush's Policy is not helping the war on terrorism. What do you think?
According to Bush, Afghanistan has been the main battleground in the war on terrorism besides Iraq. So, we are fighting Taliban regime because they hosted OB Laden, prime suspect in the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York? What about OBL himself? What about our ally Saudi Arabia which has been supporting Sunni terrorists? What about Pakistan, which hates USA and proven to sponsor terrorism? What about Syria, which is supporting Hezbollah and others? What about Libya, which was on the terrorists List as well? Should we invade all those countries and shove the democracy in their throats? What do u think?

Answer 1

yes keep in mind the USA policy in the Middle East is based on the Israeli lobby policy. The Israeli lobby policy is based on war zone policy everywhere for many years to come. Read the studies of many Israeli lobby think-thank groups you will find out that endless war policy.
The Israeli government prayed for the attack on Iraq, which has eliminated the strategic threat posed by Iraq. America was pushed into the war by a group of Neo-Conservatives, almost all of them Jews, who had a huge influence on the White House. In the past, some of them had acted as advisers to Binyamin Netanyahuwww.nowarforisrael.com/

Answer 2

Is the world a safer place now than before the start of the so-called War on Terror? What if we had left Afghanistan and Iraq alone, and focused on bringing Osama Bin Laden to justice (assuming that he actually was responsible for the 9-11 attacks)? So, yes, U.S. policy is not helpful, and may be fanning the flames of Islamic extremism, creating even bigger problems for Western countries down the road. The War on Terror, like the War on Drugs, has been an abysmal failure. George W. Bush and Tony Blair should both resign and hang their heads in shame.

Answer 3

in certainty there isn't any information on the 'information' approximately what's happening in Iraq. now and back you spot that properly-properly-known action picture clip showing the comparable marines breaking down the comparable door and then there is that previous buzz approximately how we killed the variety 2 guy. each and every so often some usual gets onTV and say how properly each and everything is going, yet you will possibly be certian he has his arms crossed in the back of his back while he's saying it. In genuine existence the 'Vichy Iraq' government has no genuine authority, little or no capacity and for the main area it is staffed by utilising hacks hiding out in fortress green Zone hoping that they are able to stay away from the subsequent incoming mortar around. The actual infrastructure of Iraq is entire #$%$, very virtually all the knowledgeable human beings are the two distant places or hiding out 1000's of miles from the place they used to stay below assumed names. there is fewer killings because of the fact very virtually everyon slated to be killed is already lifeless. The sunnis are being bribed with borrowed US distant places money to no longer shoot at our troops. The shiites are waiting for the U. S. to circulate away so they are able to wipe out the sunnis and the so noted as Iraqi military are ineffective. meanwhile the U. S. taxpayer is watching the Bush Junta borrow further and extra money to maintain this crackpot theory going and the GOP needs previous guy McCain to %. up the place George Bush leaves off. human beings are killed and maimed regular for no longer something. while this began our forces grew to grow to be mercenaries for the Oil Mafia and none of that has replaced. Iraqi oil grow to be meant to pay for all of this mess and the U. S. grow to be meant to be 'safer'. that did no longer ensue. the great question is...why interior the hell hasn't Bush and something of his posse of degenerate reactionaries been arrested, cost, convicted and despatched up? Oh, properly...that probable would not have made the 'information' the two.

Answer 4

Our policies aren't hurting the war on terrorism anymore than our policies are hurting the war on drugs. In effect, what I'm saying is that both are bullshit wars that aren't ever going to stamp out the things they are trying to get rid of, and we're just throwing away countless amounts of money and lives fighting an everlasting war. To me, these two things are equivalent to the everlasting wars referred to in Orwell's 1984.
I'm not saying that America is under a totalitarian regime or anything, but that we're never going to crawl from our economic crises or close the gap between rich and poor unless we stop throwing countless billions/trillions of dollars at futile causes.
By the way, I'm not a stinking liberal, as I'm sure some of you would assume. I'm simply another moderate American who sees where the nation is at(and has been for the past 25 years), and weeps to think that our great nation has become so much of a corrupt wasteland that our greedy-*** founding fathers would be ashamed of the abortion that we have become.

Answer 5

There was not a war on terrorism until the U.S. was attacked on 9-11. President Bush has made the right choice is taking the fight to them and not in doing as clinton did and set and wait for more attacks. Do you think for a minute that if the President were to know of OBL's location that the bastard raghead would be alive today? We all know when clinton had several chances to kill OBL long before the 9-11 attacks he did nothing and even went so far as to refuse to take him on the silver plate he was offered on by Sudan. Your question about Pakistan is flawed in that it fails to consider the facts That they have arrested and killed many terrorist and have provided intell on the terrorist activities. The war on terror will not end in Iraq if we are to win... it must go through both Damascus and Tehran.

Answer 6

There are extreme problems in "exporting democracy." People value that which they themselves create. It's different when you have it 'shoved down your throat.' The Arab street is now given a passion (hatred of the U.S.), and there is no way to paint that specific aspect of the current geopolitical landscape in a positive light.

Answer 7

dude, america has interfered with the middle east from a Long time ago, since zionism was aided by the brits and americans to snatch arab palestinian lands ... this coupled with invasion of afghanistan, iraq, and lebanon yielded bloodbath... innocent civilians were being killed... america has for tooo long destroyed the middle east... and now that the east is rising to challenge its tyrany and power, it starts to cleverly portray them as "the enemy" or "undemocratic" or "not freedom loving" people.. all of this is to fool the american citizens to gain their support... YET america does not confess its heinous crimes against palestine, iraq, afghanistam, lebanon....did it?? never!

Answer 8

America is wasting money, time and lives attempting to enforce nation-building where it isn't wanted, rather than going after the terrorists themselves.

Answer 9

I think the US is in big trouble,, Bush is in a pickle and don't want to say he was wrong,, so he will stay his course of no return,,,

Answer 10

I think we need to get rid of the yoke of liberalism and get our best planes and weapons out of mothballs.