Side A gets: Terrell Owens
Side B gets: Willis McGahee and Plaxico Buress
Who gets the better side of the deal
2006-08-30 15:38:06 · 6 answers · asked by The MAN 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I was thinking of picking Side A (ah, who am I kidding?, I choose Side B of course). Terrell Owens sign with Dallas hoping to change his attitude and increase his fantasy value as the no. 1 reciever, as well as Drew Bledsoe. Looks like 'old' habits never dies. Ever since then, he has complain about a hamstring/groin type of injury and even hired a specialist to look at his injury (Steve Smith and Hines Ward are suffering from the same injury, but there not complaining about it). Heck, he even 'channel' into his inner Lance Armstrong, wearing cyclist gear while on a training bike (not a real bicycle). As of is his trademark, he shows up late for a team meeting and miss pratice, being fined $9,500 by the team (Can you say Allen Iverson?). Bill Parcell is one of the greatest head coach in the NFL, but he has limits on tolerance, especially on Owens. McNabb must be jumping with joy on this one as Jerry Jones might be on the defibulator come the end of the season. Even though he has great talent, he's also a let-me-down type of player that could make-or-break a season. I suggest that Owens would be a high-risk, high-reward kind of player.
Sure, McGahee had one of the worst 1,000 yard season among RB mostly because of Losman's bad play. However, Losman has done well in preseason and if he can translate that in this season, look for McGahee to feel less pressure than last season. Buress is an up-and-coming WR, but always choke during crunch time. It doesn't help that Eli Manning has a reputation of being a 50% passer, INT-prone QB. If Manning could pass better like his older brother Peyton, Buress could have a great season.
2006-08-31 06:29:53 · answer #1 · answered by mojo8983 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Side B wins that trade hands down. T.O. is good, but his numbers won't be that superior to Burress. Throw in the fact that you never know if Owens will make it through a season, whether due to injury or his awful personality, and I'm not even sure I'd want him over Burress at all. Adding McGahee just makes the trade ridiculously bad for Side A.
2006-08-30 22:36:58 · answer #2 · answered by numbnuts 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a tough one, but I would go with Ryan Grant. The quarterback situation in Baltimore isn't the best right now, and if they don't have the ability to make a big play in passes, then the defense can focus on taking away the run. Even with Aaron Rodgers behind the helm in Green Bay, they still will have a solid pass attack and good O-Line to keep Grant getting big numbers.
2016-03-17 05:03:10 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe you are actually thinking about this. McGahee is a beast and Buress is the #1 receiver in NY............T.O. will do just what he did in Philly...bring the team down. if he even plays..
2006-08-31 02:03:35 · answer #4 · answered by unan1m0us 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Side B by a mile!
2006-08-30 18:53:54 · answer #5 · answered by choonmengat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No comparison..."B" by a landslide!!!
2006-08-30 15:45:13 · answer #6 · answered by heat_mizor 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
side b.
2006-08-30 15:45:08 · answer #7 · answered by whoeddy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋