English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think most of us are playing the race card when we say that. Technically you're saying that you didn't get the job because you were white. Have you ever considered the fact that the person who did get the job was just better qualified than you? Feel free to agree with me.

2006-08-30 14:18:11 · 8 answers · asked by posture 3 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

8 answers

Yes, and I would appreciate if white people would stop denying that they play the race card. It's so annoying.

2006-08-31 00:48:41 · answer #1 · answered by glow 6 · 0 0

no one particularly seems to understand what affirmative action potential. Hiring quotas does not equivalent affirmative action. In an occasion the place activity applicants are employed in line with some purpose standards, like a try score, every time an applicant with a decrease score is employed over somebody with a hire score using fact of their race, it somewhat is incorrect. Affirmative action DOES artwork once you're offered with 2 the two qualified applicants. If between the applicants is a member of a minority team, the hiring of that guy or woman will sell selection interior the region of work, which may be the objective of any affirmative action application. it somewhat is the actual meaning of affirmative action.

2016-09-30 04:45:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Actually, I strongly disagree with you. In case you haven't noticed, typical state jobs that were once noted for requiring advanced degrees now regularly hire those with no education beyond high school, those who just barely speak English and are sorely under qualified for the positions they apply for.

Yet, strangely enough, they fit some sort of quota. Oh yes, that would be the PC minority quota.

Do your research, affirmative action equals reverse discrimination. If you don't believe me, then you have either benefited from affirmative action or you have yet to compete for jobs in the white collar sector.

I'm not a bigot. What I think is that employment should be based solely on qualifications and education with NO REGARD for race, gender or anything not related to the job. Only then will it be "fair".

2006-08-30 14:26:41 · answer #3 · answered by lilly 5 · 0 0

I think people should be hired solely on their qualifications, and never on their race. The color of your skin or the country of your ancestors' origin has nothing to do with your ability to perform a job. I would like to think that any employer would see this logic and there would be no need for affirmative action. Unfortunately, I also understand that this is not always the case.

2006-08-30 14:27:02 · answer #4 · answered by MegySu 2 · 0 0

When I complain about Affirmative Action its because they want to cancel it or do away with it. African-Americans are IN NO WAY given equal access to jobs or are treated equally to "white america" I don't care what anyone says. Please don't tell me there are "no qualified African-Americans" because there ARE.

Its only been since around 1970 or so that they were given "equal access under the law." Yes, it came a "few years before that." But, no one made the EEOC enforce rules or even care what happened before the '70's. We still have a long way to go to get equal access to jobs for all races/genders.

2006-08-30 14:27:34 · answer #5 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 1 0

No. Affirmative Action is treating people differently on the basis of race. It's wrong no matter what race is doing it. It's not my fault that some white people had slaves many years ago, or that some white people are racist today. We are all individuals, not units of a monolithic race.

2006-08-30 14:25:05 · answer #6 · answered by Eric H 4 · 0 0

The "race card" is used, as a term, more often to suggest surprising some kind of opponent with an argument that one cannot argue against: a "race card" is always the trump card.

Some complain about it because they believe that Aff. Act. is an illogical motion to favor underqualified applicants, which it probable is. Having liberal sensibilities to some extent, both you and I, recognize that supporting underclassmen has benefits to society in the long term.

2006-08-30 14:23:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have mixed feelings about this. I have seen (and worked) in places where people have the same job I do and have no qualifications whatsoever. I have been in places where they were more qualified as well... It depends on the person. But I do not agree with having to have a quota or ratio of a certain color skin and ethnic background in any company. But I suppose it helps prevents lawsuits!

2006-08-30 14:25:23 · answer #8 · answered by freaknerd 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers