I believe as humans we are biologically engendered to search for companionship. Some people find a person that they are compatible with (sexually, mentally, emotionally, personality wise, etc.) early on in life and others go through a few people to find that ONE. But i believe in the end we are made to procreate and spend our lives with one person. If he or she dies, we long for another companion. This does not mean we are not monogamous. It just means we will be monogamous to another person in the event we lost our husband / wife
But humans actions are not based solely on their biological make up. Our environments have as much potential to affect our personalities as our genetics do. Nature verses Nurture? Some men or women might have been raised in environments where they never grew up seeing their mother and/or father be monogamous with one partner. So they may only be following the cycle that way laid out for them by their parents.
2006-08-30 14:42:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
are you kidding
in all cultures especially ancient ones all men had several or more wives depending or their wealth
it is only recent Christianity who tries to impose this monogamous idea
I know several African guys who have more than one wife
and in Arabia it is only recently that men are sticking to one wife
and not all men
in Nature it is also a rare occurrence,such as wolves
and humanity is having a lot of problems with it
judging by the number of divorces,and the number of men playing around outside their marriage
the multiple wife philosophy is far better
older and uglier wives do not get discarded ,but remain respected within the family structure ,if hubby decides to take a younger fresher partner.
in Monogamous deals ,a change of sexual mate results in
the family being broken up ,wives end up in the street and children are affected,a much worse system all round
2006-08-30 14:22:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a Behavior modifications enforced by Culture. Biologically, If men went solely by instinct and drive to reproduce, we tend to think, quantity to insure survival of the species. Women, under the same directive aim at quality, choosing the best available mate to insure the same thing.
2006-08-30 14:19:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pundit Bandit 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't exactly know, but this is what i can summarize from one of Evolutionary Psychology research:
When hominid (human) started to walk with two pedals instead of four, their internal organs are at risk of litterally falling inside out. Hence the hole in their tailbone grew smaller. Hence pregnancy and giving birth came with a death-risk for females. Hence females are more relunctant to engange sexual behavior than males (contrast to other mammals). Hence males felt deprived and became more sexually aggressive, and promiscuous too (contrast to other mammals). Hence females proposed a set of rules of engagement. Hence human species recognized marriage institution.
(my comment again: but i think this explanation disregards the evolution of human emotion)
2006-08-30 17:28:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by adih 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know about genetically monogamous, but i doubt it. Swans and geese are monogamous and if one partner dies, they don't find amnother mate, they just grieve til they die. Exceptions have been found if the separation is in the first year or so.
2006-08-30 14:36:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by nursesr4evr 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, its not a genetic thing. Its more to do with the fact that we are barely able to cope with the responsibilities of a 2 way relationship, never mind 3 or more.
2006-08-30 14:14:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by a tao 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Monogamy is more of a religious and social construct than a genetic trait - one reason the laws of marriage (no premarital sex, one exclusive partner) were pushed so heaviy was to make birth and tax records more accurate.
2006-08-30 14:14:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by pyrrhic_victories 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't really think there is an answer to that question. You can argue for humans' animalistic nature, but then you can also argue that it's part of what separates us from the animals.
So - it depends on who you ask.
2006-08-30 14:17:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by BettyBoop 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
through your time living people come & go out of your life , because they are only ment to be in your life for that season.life is all about learning & experiencing new things to help you become a better person.
2006-08-30 14:14:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by RAY ! 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Men need to spread their seed.
2006-08-30 14:10:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by S K 7
·
0⤊
0⤋