if slavery were legal today would pres. bush own slaves? good or evil master?

Question

im talking if the practice was never made illegal and he is the same person he is today.

Answer 1

He'd probably own slaves, since he isfrom arich family and his home is Texas

Answer 2

There is a place today where slavery is common and unbothered by the local police. That place is a couple countries in Africa.

What a horrid surprise. The evil whites outlawed slavery, but the kind and humanitarian pigmented people still have them.

Don't call me names. check it out. I suspect the Rev's Sharpton and Jackson probably forgot to tell you that tidbit, right?

Most slaves who were brought to the US on slave ships were taken slaves by their fellow pigmented people and sold at the beaches. don't call me names; check it out.

There are no good races and no bad races, just as there are no good genders or bad genders. There are good whites and bad whites; there are good pigmented people and bad pigmented people; there are good men and bad men; there are good women and bad women.

I am somewhat single minded about this topic. Anyone who can't agree with that statement is stupid, end of debate.

Answer 3

we are already slaves. At each second, we are serving someone, no matter if we conform to achieve this or not. after we are toddlers, we are serving our moms and dads' desires, and our instructors' desires. after we are adults, we are serving the organisation, the state, our kin, even pets. we are able to target to deny this, yet when your boss says, "attempt this", and also you refuse, no more beneficial pastime. we are slaves to our guidelines also, yet we are prepared slaves. We conform to adhere to the regulation, yet when we do not, we are compelled to by using the skill of penitentiary. If we do not pay taxes, they take our domicile, our passport. who isn't a slave? even as someone needs to own a slave, they say, "i do not favor to be the servant, i favor to be the served". they are in simple terms attempting to be God. we've a restricted volume of freedom, yet we are not loose. no matter if we in a roundabout way take care of to develop into served by using yet another human, we are nonetheless a slave to organic regulation. At any second, a flood can come, or a twister, earthquake, or hearth, and take your slave away, with your position and all of your sources. What then, is the that technique of your possession? we are able to not even administration our own bodies. we are pretending we are on proper of factors, yet in an hour, your body will stress you to end what you're doing and bypass to the lavatory. you're compelled to serve even the body, or it is going to desolate tract you. in case you do not serve the tummy, the body dies. So, how can it ever be moral for one slave to own yet another slave?

Answer 4

consider the fact we are all slaves at least to our society. we can not do anything each individual desires because of the laws, rules and mores of the society in which we live. in my studying i determined that slavery would have gone out of existance because of technology advancing so rapidly.

Answer 5

Yes lots of slaves and he would be a badddddddddddddass master.

Answer 6

Why ask slave – the most obedient are sure they are free.

Answer 7

yes

Answer 8

You'd still be a dipsh!t.

Answer 9

No He wouldn't! But,you probably would.

Answer 10

No