They don't realize that if we don't fight there, they will bring the fight here. I had much rather be fighting on their soil, than mine. I hate to say it but until they have their friends or family attacked they won't think that they have any thing to worry about. With that said they just jump on the Celebrity band wagon (because that's their role models, since they usually come from a broken home or had a bad childhood).
2006-08-30 12:29:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by tax_hater 2
·
0⤊
6⤋
Pronk, even the President and his staff has said several times that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. This is why George Bush is in the white house tripling the price of oil; because of Republicans and Democrats that don't know the facts or what they're talking about.
The president said,"we're attacking Iraq because of 9/11 and because they have weapons of mass destruction." He lied.
Iraq posed no threat to us and was actually our ally during the Iraq/Iran wars. Iraq didn't have a Navy and many of their weapons were weapons WE; the U.S. sold to them in the 80's.
Just like the lie's when they lied to the U.S. and said for sure there are weapons of mass destruction. Colin Powel lied at the UN meeting he lead saying they had complete proof. They didn't have squat. You or I are more of a threat to the U.S. than Iraq posed. This is the most corrupt and inept administration in history.
It's also funny how the Republicans don't worry much about 3rd world black nations where millions of people are dying and being killed over the years. If the middle east didn't have oil, the U.S. would care less if they lived or died.
Korea has now said they have tested nuclear weapons and they wont' stop. We ask them please stop. We invade Iraq and they dont' have any.
It's too bad that people are more worried about the loyalty to their parties president than what's right.
Bush was right though when he was on the Nimitz after our initial attack of Iraq.
Oil prices when Bush began office: $1.49
Predicted oil prices when he leaves office: $3.50-$4.00/gallon.
Mission accomplished.
2006-08-30 12:34:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ice4444 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Iraq didn't attack us, Osama Bin Laden planned and funded an attack carried out by Al Qaeda, while gettting protection from the Taliban government in Afghanistan. That's why right after 9/11 we went to Afghanistan, not Iraq.
2006-08-30 12:30:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by cay_damay 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Iraq didn't attack us on 9/11/2001.
2006-08-30 12:27:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
2006-08-30 12:26:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by PARKERD 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11! Afghanistan was the bad guys!
2006-08-30 12:27:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paul 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Ummm, what planet are you from?
Iraq didn't attack us on 9/11, the Taliban did... Let's not use George Bush as a source anymore okay?
2006-08-30 12:26:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by kchivers-carter@sbcglobal.net 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
9/11 Was the Oculation of Jupiter. The most holy day in the Islamofascist astrological calender.
Now the big question is why didn't the CIA know about the Islamic calender???
Go big Red Go
2006-08-30 12:50:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by 43 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
the Irony of this question is the people that actually responded as if Iraq had attacked us ? check out Tax Hater.. not only did he not get it but he gave a whole paragraph on the "non" subject.. man ? live in a Vacuum much ?
2006-08-30 12:36:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by hardartsystems 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
They didn't and they didn't have any terrorist in their country till we invaded them . Only Bush and his administration knows the real reason we did that .
I can't believe that , tax hater , you still believe that lame excuse . If we were to fight the terrorist on their ground we would be wiping them off the face of Afghanistan . That's where they are and always have been . Not Iraq , show me the connection .
2006-08-30 12:29:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They didn't!
Iraq did not attack us on September 11th, Al-Qaeda did.
Iraq has nothing to do with Sept. 11th, we initiated the war against them because of the oil. As well as to turn the attention away from the fact that we could not find Bin Laden.
2006-08-30 12:26:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by TikiTantrum 2
·
3⤊
1⤋