you can't say both.
2006-08-30 11:28:21 · 13 answers · asked by Edward 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I can't stand either one of these brothers from a different mother.
Rumsfeld's mouth runs without loading his brain. Now according to Rummy's twisted logic, I am now a morally challenged person, because I disagree with his manufactured war.
I think perhaps the morally bankrupt people are those who can shake hands with Saddam Hussein and support his arms buildup and then lie to American families who have sacrificed their loved ones for a war without "real" provocation.
Somewhere the spirit of Edgar Allen Poe visits the sounds of 2500+ beating hearts to disturb Donnie's sleep.
He will face a reckoning one day. I hope he is prepared.
2006-08-30 11:33:01 · answer #1 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cheney
2006-08-30 12:11:14 · answer #2 · answered by booboo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rumsfeld...not even close. Cheney is basically just a "Second String President"...his job is basically to be ready "just in case".
Rumsfeld is incompetent.
2006-08-30 11:43:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dick Cheney- He is incompetent
2006-08-30 11:35:23 · answer #4 · answered by Sally Pepsi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
dick cheney
2006-08-30 11:32:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I hate both of the globalist money ridden war mongering peices of shits
2006-08-30 12:27:15 · answer #6 · answered by trl_666 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I go with Rumsfeld because he gave iraq all there weapon
2006-08-30 11:31:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I dont really know them to say if I dislike either of them. They seem okay.
2006-08-30 11:34:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
both have no oil policy like olmart
2006-08-30 11:34:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
beer makes me burp
2006-08-30 11:35:24 · answer #10 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋