Keep in mind that a lot of fees were added to what may have been the last statement your friend saw. Default fees, Trustee Sale Fees, title transfer fees. junk fees, too, and no way to avoid them by choosing someone else. Not to mention unpaid mortgage interest piling up.
It's really an unusual situation where you get money back, but if it does happen, talk to the trustee.
2006-08-30 13:53:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Searchlight Crusade 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
When a property is foreclosed it is sold on the court steps by the court. The proceeds will be disbursed by the court as well. (This is different from getting a tax deed via a tax sale). If the proceeds is less than the outstanding owned including back interest, expenses and attorney fees, the court will enter a deficiency judgment on you. If there is a surplus, the court will disburse the difference to the property owner.
In realty, rarely would the sales end up with a surplus because
1. The owner is so far behind there is nothing much left.
2. At the same time, the bidders will bid only what the judgment is and not too much above what is owned
3. The lenders will throw in as much expenses and attorney fees in there so that on paper, all the equity is gone.
In a tax sales, it is not unusual to see substantial equity left behind in commercial properties but that is another illusion because the bidders may very well be the former owner who uses tax certificates as a cheap way of financing.
2006-08-30 11:35:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The former owner is entitled to the surplus. S/he must file a motion (it may be called something else depending on local practice) with the court that ordered the sale to disburse the funds to him/herself. In many jurisdictions the Court Clerk's office will supply te form. You must do it in person to prove your identity, or through an attorney who will take care of the proof. In some cases the attorney who represented the mortgage company in the foreclosure will prepare the papers for a small fee.
2006-08-30 10:30:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would certainly hope the lender isn't stupid enough to try to keep that extra money. Let me explain;
When a lender forecloses on you and sells the property and gets less than they are owed they go back to court and file for a deficiency judgment against the original borrower for the money they were not able to recover from the sale. Now then what makes anyone think that the former property owner does not have the same right in reverse? ( I think that's called law of equity)
If that logic doesn't light the pilot then go see an attorney and ask them to explain the laws in your state and in federal court regarding "Unjust Enrichment"
2006-08-30 10:16:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by newmexicorealestateforms 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1st any tax liens would be paid. Then the mortgagor. Then if there was a second mortgage on the loan, they would be paid next. But yes, if there is still money left over, it should go to the former home-owner. Note the mortgagor gets to be paid for all legal fees too.
2006-08-30 10:10:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Larry SD 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
When I was fifteen, our house got auctioned off because my mom couldn't pay the mortgage. They auctioned my saxophone, our photo albums, the stuff my mom kept of projects and report cards, they took EVERYTHING! My mom even came up with the money to pay it off, but they said it was too late..
It sold for more than asked and my mom didn't see a dime. People are slime and take as much money as they can get, no matter whos lives they have to ruin.
I feel bad for whoever went through this that you know. Let them know things do get better and I'm sorry for their loss.
2006-08-30 10:08:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by curiositykillz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
certain, the monetary employer can nevertheless make you pay. You borrowed money, not a house. the living house became in ordinary terms your collateral. you do not supply your county or state--not that I plan to analyze this. once bought think ofyou've got an extremely constrained time period to purchase the resources back for what he paid for it plus different expenses. My state tacks on a minimum of 25% extra on the pay back as a correct cost to the shopper. different states do not actually have a redemption era. California, as an get mutually, waits 5 years formerly putting the resources up for bid. They figure you had a lot of time already.
2016-12-06 00:11:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well the best thing is to probably seek legal advice, but I would think that if all finacial obligations were met then your friend would be entitled to the money.
2006-08-30 10:05:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by barney3076 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry! The mortgage company gets to keep that money.
2006-08-30 10:08:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by h2odog 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope failure to pay the dept gives the bank or leander owner ship of the property sorry your **** out of luck.
2006-08-30 11:16:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by business creature 2
·
0⤊
0⤋