why did he hate my freedoms!!! now i'm willing to give all of them up just as long a george w bush keeps me safe from saddam. oh please keep us safe from saddam mr. president!!
2006-08-30 09:28:11 · 29 answers · asked by mikeygonebad 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He didn't... but you're safe now.
2006-08-30 09:42:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Saddam has nothing to do with it and most likely Osama bin Laden either. Besides after wards, as far as I know America declared war on Afghanistan and was apparently chasing Osama within Afghanistan. What a crazy logic! Afghanistan was already flat and is more so after all the bombing. Nothing achieved! Osama bin Laden lives and apparently makes movies in which he takes part, so that the American government has more reason to believe they are right in what they did. Iraq is I guess a side effect of all this as well for which there is no real excuse. Are you really scared that Saddam will be able to do anything and take the freedom of people! I doubt it. By the way he is on trial since long. Watch CNN he is there LIVE sometimes in the court room. But the show goes on and on in Iraq. How about the freedom of Iraqis
or Afganis and many others? Who cares? Do you think Bush will save us all? I think he was lucky when he fell of the bike and nothing happened to him. I do not believe he is in anyway the person who will save the world from people like Saddam. Let us not forget. Politicians and leaders are usually scapegoats playing a role for influential people.
2006-08-30 09:56:38 · answer #2 · answered by KCD 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While Saddam played little or no role in Sept. 11, he danced in the street the day after and praised the "martyrs". For that alone I am glad he will soon hang. And the fact that Iraq can play a huge strategic role in the war on terrorism never crossed your tiny liberal mind did it? See to beat terrorism those people need an economy and more importantly, hope. Democracy can give them that, look what it did for us.
2006-08-30 09:46:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I detect some satire in your question because you know better. Even Dictator Dumbya is ON RECORD, not just once as just recently, but TWICE saying the contrary. The second time was about 2 years ago. Faux News and the other parts of the right wing "propagandy" machine just forget to report it, which is why after this belief in this lie was in long decline, it went back up a little. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-08-30 09:54:06 · answer #4 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He didn't. That was al Qaeda, and the US invaded Afghanistan to attempt to capture them, and particularly their leader bin Laden. What Saddam did was to refuse to destroy his weapons of mass destruction in a verifiable manner, as he was obliged to do by both the cease-fire agreement of 1991 and subsequent UN resolutions. In June 2002, feeling increasing pressure from the United States, Saddam secretly moved most of his WMD materials, amounting to several thousand tons, to Syria. starting in June 2002. Presumably, they are still there; they pose no immediate threat because the Syrians were not trained in their use.
2006-08-30 10:01:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
reason you're retarded? bear in mind back? They had to envision to substantiate he did not have WMD, they did not cooperate to correctly. the entire UN became getting mad, it became purely that we were the in ordinary words united states of america that had the balls to do something about it (properly, except the united kingdom and Australians to any actual volume). As to the 9/11 connection, did not Saddam have a nephew who became on between the planes or helped fund it or something? That wasn't the significant reason, even with the undeniable fact that it genuinely would not help you seem extra constructive. Thats if it became actual. Oh, and Zes, in the journey that they were surely good "Nazis" that they'd probably have already gotten rid of you "commies" already.... purely so that you realize.
2016-12-06 00:08:44 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush has come right out and admitted Saddam did not attack or order the attack on 9-11 NOW if we can get rumsfield to group therapy maybe we can get the troops home before christmas .
2006-08-30 09:38:06 · answer #7 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Saddam didn't plan 9/11. Osama Bin Ladin did.
2006-08-30 09:33:27 · answer #8 · answered by Luekas 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Saddam didn't attack us on 9/11 . Quit being stupid...
2006-08-30 09:31:33 · answer #9 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He didn't. A lie perpetrated on the American People to gain support for preemptive move into Iraq.
So in order to save the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Bush as to get rid of them in order to protect us. No thank you. We are a nation of laws, not men.
2006-08-30 09:42:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 so no need to fear him.
2006-08-30 09:37:15 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋