I do! How do you think he knew so many details of the murder??
2006-08-30 08:31:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I didn't. I knew there was something fishy from the beginning.
2006-08-30 08:37:04 · answer #1 · answered by Jessie P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With all the articles and books that have been written by people "in the know" about the murder of Jon Benet Ramsey I am not at all surprised he was able to know so many details. Her murder investigation was handled poorly from the get go. We may never know what really happened. I think John Karr is a sick, twisted pedophile who wanted his 15 minutes of fame and then some. At least now he'll be tried for his child porn charges and hopefully spend some time in jail AND be registered as a sex offender.
2006-08-30 16:10:10 · answer #2 · answered by celticwoman777 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, from day one there was doubt because when he was asked specifics he could not answer that. He was open about things that could not be proven, but when it came to the specifics he said "no comment". How he got the details...well it was a high publicized case with information and detail on many sources. He was in contact with a guy doing research for a documentary. He most likely got alot of information from him. I see this as an attempt by Karr to get out of Thialand under government protection. Just my theory though.
2006-08-30 15:38:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont think that John Karr killed JonBenet....I will always think that her parents killed her & know that John Karr got his 15 min's of fam...& on top of that her mom is dead..i dont think that the case will every be closed//John Karr was upsesst with the hole case and i think some way he is tring to cover up that JonBenet's parents did it
2006-08-30 15:42:50 · answer #4 · answered by Baby Girl 24 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The media has a lot of influence on how we preceive things. Now they say he's not guilty. If your look back, you will discover when the autopsy was completed, on JonBenet, there was no signs of sexual activity. So why would John say he had sex with her? Maybe he just wants attention.................. Whenever a crime goes unsolved, for as long as this one has, anytime someone says they did it (guilty or not) we just jump on the band wagon and believe them. Until this is solved, there will always be wierdos out there saying they did things (that they really didn't do) just for attention. They will solve it one day, who knows when but remember this - in murder cases there is no statute of limitations.
2006-08-30 15:42:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOPE -- the guy was a lunatic to begin with -- he obsesses over strange things, and from what was published, he could infer a lot of the information from that. So he could easily make up a story -- one in which he can escape from whatever trouble he was causing overseas to avoid prosecution over there.
2006-08-30 15:39:54 · answer #6 · answered by sglmom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not me!
Why didn't they just test the DNA in the beginning?
They knew - like I knew he was never the killer!!!
Waistin all MY money to feed that freak lobster n fly him on a world tour like a rock-star!!!
...REAL MESSED UP A LITTLE GIRL IS DEAD n THE WHOLE INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN A SICK CIRCUS ;-/
2006-08-30 16:23:08 · answer #7 · answered by Di 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because we want the killer found and closure for the family. He did his research.
2006-08-30 15:40:29 · answer #8 · answered by tbear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most intelligent thoughtful people did not...
2006-08-30 15:37:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋