A guy (kingStubborn) just answered one of my questions:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AgSp16UHihuFLWQuzggRlAnsy6IX?qid=20060830114358AAYcap6
and he brings up a good point, if Bush get's impeached, Cheney will be President not that it would make much difference but to give him legitimate power is the damn best reason I've heard to keep Bush in charge. No Impeachment, Keep Bush.
2006-08-30 07:52:16 · 13 answers · asked by choyryu 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
There are no grounds to impeach Bush.
2006-08-30 07:54:37 · answer #1 · answered by Terra T 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If thats not bad enough if cheney dies of a heart attack then hastert gets the job and if he stumbles down the stairs and breaks his neck then we get Ted Stevens the senator form alaska if his head explodes from yelling we then start on bushes cabinet, Rummy, and Rice abandon all hope till the elections.
2006-08-30 08:05:56 · answer #2 · answered by region50 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How much longer??
Get ready to VOTE this time!!
Get involved!!
Take this to heart, and
start paying attention!!
Somehow, this has got to
be a country that is truly run
by it's own people, and not
by a bunch of stuffed shirts
in IVORY TOWERS
that have no idea what is
really going on in this country.
OF THE PEOPLE
BY THE PEOPLE
FOR THE PEOPLE
should be the way
we do things!
2006-08-30 08:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by NANCY K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I also have a request. might desire to the anti-Bush human beings please arise with some new chants. "Bush lied. human beings died." that's previous, boring, and ineffective. perhaps a sparkling set of speaking factors besides. i've got study this comparable paragraph extra situations than is needed. Taking your "good judgment" to the subsequent step. Hillary Clinton might desire to bypass. The UN might desire to bypass. John Kerry might desire to bypass. bill Clinton might desire to have long gone. Italy might desire to bypass. France might desire to bypass. all of them had the comparable intelligence. all of them got here to the comparable end. So in the journey that your going to be consistent then maximum of congress on the two components of the aisle might desire to bypass. As for the debt. You do comprehend that each and each spending bill that Bush signed first went by using Congress.
2016-11-06 02:14:05 · answer #4 · answered by saturnio 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i thought he was in charge already.
additionally it would seem to me any impeachment of Bush would take about 8 other guys out as well. kind of a dirty secret gang going on in DC right now...
2006-08-30 07:55:24 · answer #5 · answered by simianfever 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
must not be very old or not remember all that impeachment talk with Clinton .... impeachment doesn't mean the president would be removed from office.
2006-08-30 08:01:51 · answer #6 · answered by Icon 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Scary thought, isn't it? That was why I was somewhat against the imeachment of Slick Willy. The thought of having to say 'President Gore' just gave me the heebie-jeebies!!
2006-08-30 07:59:28 · answer #7 · answered by Lonnie P 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
your question is stupid, there is no reason why bush should be impeached, he didn't lie under oath like the previous president!
2006-08-30 07:59:12 · answer #8 · answered by AFwife 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush...because he'll never be thrown out of office, just as Clinton wasn't.
2006-08-30 07:57:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To make coffee you need grounds
sorry bud there was direct evidence against Clinton and he wasn't so till you can show me some grounds it is only your wish
2006-08-30 07:55:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋