What is the difference between vandalism without any motive and vandalism with the motive of economic dissuasion? What is the difference between terroristic destruction of property and destruction of property as economic dissuasion?
2006-08-30 07:08:06 · 4 answers · asked by Aleksandr 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Legally, being labeled a terrorist gives a vandal a severe sentence. It is not considered the same as a common vandal.
2006-08-30 07:16:46 · update #1
with motive mean you invoked it
2006-08-30 07:14:54 · answer #1 · answered by Archangel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the goal? What? That's insane. Anyway...the definition of valdalism is: Willful or malicious destruction of public or private property. I don't believe it matters what the "goal" is/was. The sentence would differentiate by severity of the crime, say a person would get his hand slapped for throwing eggs at your house, but a person would possibly serve time for going into the library and dousing all the books with a fire hose.
Being a terrorist takes vandalism to a whole new level. Now it isn't "vandalism", it is terrorism.
2006-08-30 07:29:07 · answer #2 · answered by Zelda 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the goal. Both are criminal, and both will probably carry the same criminal punishment based on the act itself.
But the difference is in the mindset of the person. Is a serial killer who slays blonds because his first girlfriend dumped him more or less dangerous than a contract assassin who only kills for money. Is the person who burns buildings because they enjoy carnage better or worse than the professional arsonist for profit.
The difference comes in how (or whether) they can be rehabilitated. The professional arsonist or assassin made a career choice. She does it for the money, but has no personal or emotional stake in the outcome. Getting that person to stop is very different than the person who kills or burns out of mindless hatred or psychopathic rage.
And understanding why someone is committing crimes is the first step in being able to stop them.
2006-08-30 07:11:04 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course that would desire to be vandalism. It doens't remember while you're advertisting a product. How might you experience if somebody placed a banner on the portion of your place. It would not make a distinction if that's city property. that's somewhat lots the comparable element as graffiti.
2016-11-06 02:09:12 · answer #4 · answered by saturnio 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋