English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-30 06:50:57 · 24 answers · asked by Special nobody 5 in Sports Football (American)

24 answers

LEAST: Los Angeles

Los Angeles is just not an NFL town. They already have two pro teams there... USC and UCLA. They may not be NFL teams, but the fans there sure treat them like they are! The Raiders and Rams BOTH couldn't compete with the Trojans and the Bruins, so why would another team be able to?

MOST: Central Illinois.

The cities of Springfield, Peoria, Bloomington and Champaign would all get behind a team in the region. Chicago and St. Louis are both about a three hour drive from central Illinois so most fans in the area don't regularly attend Ram or Bear games. There's over three million people in central Illinois and almost all of them would get behind a team located anywhere in the area.

2006-08-30 08:06:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Las Vegas- too lots in possibility with playing l. a.- perhaps yet another risk and greatest marketplace in united statesa. Orlando- solid marketplace and Disney's there Toronto- in all risk the place the charges will finally end up San Antonio- Saints might desire to pass there if New Orleans would not approve a sparkling stadium Oklahoma city- they might help an NFL group in basic terms as they're helping the Thunder of the NBA (even nonetheless they suck)

2016-11-06 02:05:18 · answer #2 · answered by treiber 4 · 0 0

Most - Cleveland because Art Modell is a heartless prick who ripped the guts right out of that city when he moved them.

Least - Los Angeles because they couldn't support the Rams and Raiders when they had them and poll after poll shows they don't WANT an NFL team. (But they're going to end up with one because the league is greedy if shortsighted.)

Least No. 2 - Jacksonville because it's a poorly laid-out city and was a mistake when the choice was made in the early '90s.

2006-08-30 08:53:19 · answer #3 · answered by Lawn Jockey 4 · 0 1

What's with the Buffalo hate? The Bills are all they have, and they put their butts in those seats and sell out nearly every Sunday, no matter how good or bad the Bills are. Saying New Orleans is even worse. Katrina wasn't enough I guess...let's take their admittedly crappy sports team from them!

As for least deserving....Los Angeles. They had two teams, all that money, and all those people, and they couldn't be bothered to show up enough to keep even 1. And now they're trying to whore themselves out for another. I can almost guarentee any team put in LA won't stay long...

2006-08-30 10:32:04 · answer #4 · answered by Elminster 6 · 0 1

Most deserving City-San Antonio-they love football in San Antonio and used every possible resource to host the Saints last season. They did a great job. San Antonio already has a nice dome stadium as well. Texans love football as well. #1 state in the U.S. for high school football.

Least-Los Angeles. How many teams will it take to come and go before the NFL realizes that L.A. isn't interested in football?

2006-08-30 09:22:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Without a doubt LA needs a team.
It is the biggest slap in the face to America when the 2nd biggest and 2nd richest city can't even keep a team happy in Tinsel Town!
I can see Buffalo or New Orleans the next cities to move.
Seattle is a great city, but totally the furthest away from any other team (too much travel time)

2006-08-30 07:10:49 · answer #6 · answered by Brad NotPitt 4 · 1 2

Most: Any city in New Jersey... They deserve their own team since the two existing "Jersey" teams don't have the balls to claim where they truly call home.

Least: Los Angeles. They've had teams before, and they screw it up everytime.

2006-08-30 06:58:36 · answer #7 · answered by Physh 4 · 0 1

most deserving STATE - NY
most deserving City - NY city
least deserving STATE - Texas
least deserving City - Buffalo

2006-08-30 07:56:41 · answer #8 · answered by Eltownzjem 3 · 0 1

Los Angeles, California should get a team back!

2006-08-30 06:52:28 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 1 0

most - jersey city, new jersey doesn't have a football team, even though the New York Giants stadium is in NJ, they belong to Ny, which is a load of BS...New york is even taking out B-ball team away. This one goes to NJ

least - Ny

2006-08-30 06:53:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers