2006-08-30 05:18:26 · 16 answers · asked by Jessica - AKA - Carolina Girl 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Heck yes!
2006-08-30 05:21:45 · answer #1 · answered by Mags 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I think she has the sense enough to stay away from the task. In addition, she is prone to speaking her mind, something the whiny leftists think is only for them to do without being criticized.
As polarized as this country appears to be, it is amazing how the values have changed in so many areas. It hasn't been all that long when Ann Coulter would have been applauded for speaking as she has, especially the need for personal initiative. I can understand the country's confusion, however, even if I don't agree with liberal solutions.
A portion of the young are always for something that will give them a handout, someone else's money or good fortune. Every generation has that. Maybe all those years of working at a job to get to retirement is less secure and more fraught with difficulties these days. Maybe they see it as a right to be able to enjoy themselves more and work less. That's what we get when we have a world that is so close-knit by information we can't process: some work to solve the problem and others will turn away from it.
All I can think about is how appeasement got us into WW II. Those terrorists don't hate us because we are over there; they hate us because of our individual freedoms. I can't say that it was right that I have mine and that everyone else can go suck eggs. The conundrum is that New Orleans is a lot like Iraq: some people just want everyone else to do the work for them.
I would be very satisfied if we had politicians who really said and did things in which they believed rather than the drivel they say just to get in office. Maybe Ann should run after all!
2006-08-30 05:49:52 · answer #2 · answered by Bentley 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ann Couter does not make an incredible footstool. She's thoroughly egotistical. She's were given a mouth on her which could get us nuked in a warmth 2d and she isn't smart sufficient to run a lemonade stand more effective-or-a lot less a u . s ..
2016-12-05 23:41:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do like what Annie has to say, and have even spent money on her books. But I believe she's too obsessively right-wing and stuck in her negative opinion of the right to be an effective president. The president needs to be able to consider both sides of an issue, even if s/he doesn't like one side or the other. I doubt she would be able to do that.
2006-08-31 12:50:26 · answer #4 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She sounds like a great choice for U.S President! -she knows about as much as any other about Canada! She is awful and anyone that thinks she could run a country esp. the U.S is insane....She should be lucky that we, tolerate, her being on the same continent with us! I would love to see her come here and see how she makes out with saying those things to our faces! Now that would be entertainment!
2006-08-31 07:21:41 · answer #5 · answered by photogirl1577 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Good Idea.
We cannot do worse.
we need a motor mouth in the oval office
2006-08-30 05:42:29 · answer #6 · answered by sligoman 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
President of what? The Third Reich?
2006-08-30 05:25:53 · answer #7 · answered by Edward K 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
A female version of Bush?
Maureen Dowd can be her running mate.
2006-08-30 05:23:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh there's an intelligent choice. She wants death to those who disagree with her and has been accused several times for plagiarism. Your standards must not be very high for leader of this country.
2006-08-30 06:05:24 · answer #9 · answered by carpediem 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
she's so stupid
she would'nt be able to place canada on a map
2006-08-30 10:41:48 · answer #10 · answered by iron maiden 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋