First of all, if you are the one with McNabb, don't involve him in any of those trades. McNabb is going to have a great season and is ranked much higher than Brees and Vick. none of the running backs in the trade have much promise right now as Bush is a rookie who will split tie with Deuce, Jamal Lewis is hurt, and Barlow is simply a short-term fill-in who isn't very good.
I wouldn't do any of those trades.
2006-08-30 04:42:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Poopie Johnson 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Let's Break this deal down
Vick/ Mcnabb- Mcnabb is better
Bush/ Barlow- Bush is better
So, don't do this deal
Drew Brees/ Mcnabb- Mcnabb is better
Jamal Lewis/ Barlow- Jamal has a slight advantage due to experience
Don't do this deal
I don't like either of these deals, but I like the second one better than the first one.
2006-08-30 12:16:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tucker C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would stick with Vick and Bush. McNabb is coming off injury and is a huge question mark and Barlow is just so-so. Bush has the chance to have a big year.
If you really need a QB that bad do the Lewis for McNabb and Barlow one. Lewis is also a question mark so you wouldnt be losing much with him.
2006-08-30 12:08:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, that's a tough one. You might be better of keeping McNabb and Barlow, but if you decide to deal take the Vick and Bush deal.
2006-08-30 11:40:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Drunk365 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
do not trade Bush in any deal that gets you Barlow in return. That's silly. Keep Vick and Bush.
2006-08-30 12:03:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by mikep426 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Keep McNabb, both those trades have horrible "risk-rewards" NOT in your favor
2006-08-30 11:44:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by maximusthegr8 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i agree with every one else if you have donovan them keep him, if you dont go get him, i think he's gonna have a good year especially with pickston coming over, gl!!
2006-08-30 11:59:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-08-30 11:55:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋