Was the 1993 WTC attack done by Bill Clinton in an effort to start a war to grab oil in the Middle East, or was it terrorists trying to attack America?
That's what I thought you would say.
So why are you saying such vile things about George W. Bush?
2006-08-30 03:38:41 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You can't talk sense to liberals... they don't understand facts or logic, just their socialist dogma.
To DEEjay: Osama was free to orchestrate 9/11 BECAUSE of Clinton. They had him but Clinton chose to let him go. Thanks Bill!
2006-08-30 04:02:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not a conspiracy theorist, but I do think it's a good point that Clinton caught the people responsible for '93. Yet, bin Laden is still free.
While there are a few kooks who think that Bush planned it, there are no more than the kooky people who think Clinton killed Vince Foster (or is that conspiracy theory true because it's anti-Clinton?).
I won't say he planned it, and I don't believe that he did, but there are a lot of things that I will say about George W. Bush and number one is - he's a horrible president who has instituted the worst foreign polciy in the post-Vietnam era and had presided over one of the worst economic recovery periods since WWII.
2006-08-30 03:58:43 · answer #2 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
People are saying these things about Bush because of the way he handled the situation. He took the tragedy and turned it into a chance to seek revenge on Saddam when in truth, Osama should have been dealt with COMPLETELY before he went after Saddam. I am not saying that he shouldn't have dealt with Saddam, (Lord knows that needed to happen) I'm just saying that he should have gotten Osama first.This also applies to Katrina.
2006-08-30 03:48:29 · answer #3 · answered by onewikkedwoman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer think of Bush did it for my section. perchance it wasn't a conspiracy yet a cover-up. yet 9/11 set the degree for Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Patriot Act (end of the form). lots of money grew to become into made by using inner maximum companies via those a number of adventures.
2016-11-06 01:45:31 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
one would logically assume america would double security standards after 1993, but hey look what happened, 2001 WTC attack completely destroyed those two towers. Where did america's security go? How come they didnt see the vulnerability of the WTC?
do u see now whos lying and whos not?
2006-08-30 03:42:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its possible but I seem to remember us catching Ramzi Yousef the guy behind WTC 93, where is Bin Landen by the way.
to Jessi it was on Bushes Watch.
2006-08-30 03:50:36 · answer #6 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't blame bush for 911...i blame him for the sorry pathetic job he and the congress have done since then....
I don't know why repukes are so angry...they had their chance...had control of the congress and the white house....and the state of this country hasn't been this pathetic since nixon...
Time to let some serious educated people run the country for a while...
2006-08-30 03:46:23 · answer #7 · answered by Franklin 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Conspiracy theorists tend to be delusional, paranoid anti-government types.
I have a friend who is one of these conspiracy people. His politics are both right wing & left wing at the same time but always anti-government. I am getting sick of hearing his rants........
2006-08-30 03:55:14 · answer #8 · answered by carl l 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
FDR started WW2? Hmm yea it couldn't have been those damn Nazis or that crazy Hitler bent on mass genocide.
No you couldn't Judy. You are a mindless follower of the media.
Stringer...im sorry, Dems will lose again in 08'
2006-08-30 03:44:57 · answer #9 · answered by thrty2mars 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Everything since the first life on earth, according to the conspiracy nuts, has been a US/CIA plot.
2006-08-30 03:41:14 · answer #10 · answered by kristycordeaux 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋