WHY and HOW was tony blair voted prime minister again when he has clearly cocked our country up!!?

Answer 1

I want to know who let him in in the first place!!!! It's those you should be annoyed with!

Answer 2

Because the Labour party lied plain and simple. Blair was on his way out, his popularity had sunk below the scale. So the labour Party put round the notion that if elected Blair would stand down (some said within 3 months).

People bought into this - vote labour - kept the Tories out and get rid of the loser Blair in one go.

Seemed to good to be true and it was! As usual Blair didn't keep his word or maybe just maybe Bush told him to stay on.

Answer 3

I cannot understand why he is still there either and most people I speak to seem to think the same. Clearly we must be in the minority so where are the majority?

Harry H - yes we have everything - terrorists, bombings, higher council tax, fewer services, massive illegal immigration, no attempt to put things right which are apparently wrong, a government who does not understand that they are our 'servants' and not the other way round - shall I continue?
Yes, please bring back Maggie, at least she said exactly what she meant and stuck to what she believed was right and she could be trusted. Perhaps it was the fact she was a woman, not necessarily a Conservative, that she was dynamic, for example,the Falklands was not a protracted open ended war even though it was not a welcome war.

Answer 4

Because the Tories were the opposition, How can anybody say Maggie told the truth. She lied over the belgrano affair, she lied over the closure of the coal mines by saying there is no list of pits we want to close. Milke Heseltine soon proved that lie by producing in parliament the full list, and he was a member of her government. I| still cant say that women's name without disgust and anger.

Answer 5

properly, the different device is to have a quickly elected president and look the place that have been given the individuals! Its not extra effective there! what's truly undesirable is that basically approximately 27% of persons who have been eligible to vote on the final election, voted for Labour. And basically approximately 37% of persons who certainly voted, voted for Labour. So Labour did no longer even get a majority of votes - it grew to become into basically basically over a 0.33 of the votes. we've a tousled balloting device in this u . s ..

Answer 6

If you consider he got in on a very low number of votes. The Tory party were not ready to fight him. Dave the hood is not the one to beat him. So they must find a new leader if they want to win. He is destroying the country but until someone else replaces him???

Answer 7

Basically his opponents were even more crap than he was, they ahd no policy, were at each others throats, their leader was incompetent and people trusted him less than Blair. Thats the why, the how is simple, they just put an X next to either his name, or his supporters name, depending where in the country you lived.

Answer 8

I take it you were not around in the Thatcher days.
That was one Major **** up!

I prefer Blair to any of his predecessors.
Who would you have instead of him?
I have to ask if you vote , or do you consider it a waste of time?

Answer 9

The opposition was even worse, as the Tories have recognised through the way they dumped Howard for Cameron.

Answer 10

This is an easy question. In a free election, Brits made his party the largest in Parliament. Naturally, you don't believe majority rules, do you?

Answer 11

Erm, because the alternative didn't bear thinking about?

This country is in a far better state than when Labour came to power after Tory rule!