2006-08-30 03:13:29 · 14 answers · asked by Ravi 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
both as bad as
2006-08-30 03:15:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden- he's a complete nut job. Bush is only dangerous from the terrorist point of view.
2006-08-30 10:17:29 · answer #2 · answered by Coo coo achoo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow. Great question. Is Bin Laden even alive? Then again is Bush?
2006-08-30 10:17:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are equally as dangerous, both command other to fight for them; both are dictators and rulers of there particular factions, whether it be a country or a group of militants; both have people who are willing to die for their cause; both have no regard for "innocents." They are equally capable of destroying the fractured peace that reigns in their respective countries, and they threaten each other at the cost of "human lives."
The greatest thing they have in common is George Bush Sr., One is the "son" the other is a business partner, imagine that.
If one thinks about it, the similarities between them are so many that if not for where they were transposed to each others countries, they would probably be at war with each other, even then.
2006-08-30 10:25:03 · answer #4 · answered by Insight 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush by far. He is in control of the strongest aggression and intervention force in the world. Death and destruction in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and innumerable low scale conflicts and military training and assistance programs around the world.
BTW this is costing American lives and treasury to boot. Shame!
2006-08-30 10:20:43 · answer #5 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For me and my country Bush is more dangerous
2006-08-30 10:17:26 · answer #6 · answered by Lunazuly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden of course. What a silly question.
2006-08-30 10:16:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush - he has access to nukes and is openly killing people. Osama is on the run, hiding in caves (or playing poker in the White House basement, to be paraded before the people whenever the war profiteers need Republicans elected.)
2006-08-30 10:16:52 · answer #8 · answered by Silent Kninja 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
throughout his life bin laden would have killed about 4000-5000 people. george bush is responsible for AT LEAST 100,000 deaths.
2006-08-30 10:17:16 · answer #9 · answered by rimrocka 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well bin laden at least lets you know he is bad, bush pretends he is helping all the "folks"
2006-08-30 10:17:00 · answer #10 · answered by pj2024 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course bush. his war has killed hundreds thousands in iraq where osama hasnt proven did anything (even there is no evidence that he did the 9/11, it's just USA & media's guess)
Meanwhile, bush is also one of the most dagerous terrorist while he supports Israel, the greatest terrorist on earth
2006-08-30 10:26:08 · answer #11 · answered by arifin ceper 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋